Exploring implicit expenditures within agrifood systems requires a nuanced editorial analysis that delves into the intricate web of hidden costs and unseen investments. Unlike overt expenditures that are easily identifiable, implicit expenditures encompass a spectrum of indirect financial outlays, often obscured within the complexities of supply chains and production processes. This editorial aims to untangle these intricacies, shedding light on the covert expenses that permeate agrifood systems. From environmental externalities to social impacts, understanding implicit expenditures is crucial for developing sustainable and resilient agricultural practices. By dissecting the implicit financial implications, this analysis seeks to provide a comprehensive view that goes beyond traditional accounting, offering insights into the true costs associated with the production and distribution of food within agrifood systems.
Tag: GS – 3 Cropping Patterns, Modes of Irrigation, Direct & Indirect Farm Subsidies, Employment, Inclusive Growth, Environmental Pollution & Degradation, Industrial Policy
In News:
In its publication, The State of Food and Agriculture 2023, the Food and Agriculture Organization elucidates the concealed expenditures within our agrifood systems and examines their ramifications.
Unveiling the Unseen Expenses of Food and Agriculture
- Hidden expenses within agrifood systems encompass environmental outlays stemming from greenhouse gas and nitrogen emissions, water consumption, and land-use alterations.
- Additionally, health-related covert costs arise from diminished productivity due to unhealthy dietary habits, while social concealed costs emerge from the economic toll of poverty and productivity setbacks linked to undernourishment.
- The State of Food and Agriculture 2023 represents the inaugural effort by the FAO to evaluate these obscured costs on a national scale, encompassing 154 countries.
Key Global Insights from the Report
- The concealed costs of agrifood systems globally amounted to approximately 12.7 trillion dollars in 2020, measured at purchasing power parity (PPP), nearly constituting 10% of the world GDP in PPP terms.
- Dietary patterns contributing to obesity and non-communicable diseases (NCDs) were responsible for 73% of the global quantified hidden costs in 2020, leading to labor productivity losses.
- Environmental hidden costs from agriculture, comprising over 20% of the quantified hidden costs, equate to nearly one-third of agricultural value added.
- To lift the moderately poor working in agrifood systems above the moderate poverty line, it is estimated that incomes need to increase by 57% in low-income countries and 27% in lower-middle-income countries on the social front.
- These findings underscore the immediate necessity of incorporating these costs into decision-making processes for a transformative shift in agrifood systems.
Key Insights for India from the Report
- India’s total hidden costs within agrifood systems reached approximately USD 1.1 trillion, ranking as the third-largest globally, following China and the United States.
- India’s contribution accounted for 8.8% of the global quantified hidden costs of USD 12.7 trillion associated with agrifood systems.
- In comparison, China contributed 20%, and the United States contributed 12.3%, as outlined in the FAO’s report.
- Within India, the largest share (60%) of hidden costs pertained to the burden of disease, indicating productivity losses due to dietary patterns.
- This was followed by the social cost of poverty among agrifood workers (14%) and the environmental cost associated with nitrogen emissions (13%).
- The report underscores the imperative to redirect support towards transforming agrifood systems, highlighting the importance of delivering healthy and environmentally sustainable diets to all.
Unveiling the Socio-Ecological Ramifications of Intensive Agricultural Practices in India
Impact on Society:
Disruption of Indigenous Systems:
- The adoption of seeds from multinational corporations and the widespread use of fertilizers have undermined seed sovereignty, disrupted traditional knowledge systems, and shifted from diverse crops to mono-crop plantations.
Traditional Farming Resilience:
- Conversely, traditional farming practices in India, exemplified by the Barahnaja crop diversification system in the Garhwal Himalayan region, involve cultivating 12 crops in a year, providing stability and aligning with natural processes.
Rising Indebtedness:
- Privatization and deregulation of agricultural inputs have contributed to increased indebtedness among agrarian households, with the debt-to-asset ratio soaring by 630% between 1992 and 2013.
Diminishing Agrarian Income:
- Agricultural viability in India has diminished significantly, reflected in the meager average monthly household income of farming households, which stands at ₹10,816.
Impact on Ecology:
Soil Fertility Decline:
- Intensive farming practices, such as monoculture without adequate crop rotation, can deplete essential nutrients from the soil, impacting its fertility.
Groundwater Over-Extraction:
- With heavy reliance on irrigation, agriculture in India has led to excessive groundwater extraction, resulting in adverse ecological consequences.
Impact on Health:
Biodiversity Disruption:
- The expansion of rice and sugarcane cultivation contributes to biodiversity loss, increases pressure on groundwater resources, and contributes to air and water pollution.
Minimizing Hidden Costs in India’s Agrifood Systems: A Forward Path
Enhancing Crop Diversity
- Advocate for and implement crop diversification and rotation to boost soil fertility, mitigate pest risks, and enhance overall agricultural resilience.
Climate-Resilient Crop Cultivation
- Integrate traditional agricultural wisdom with modern scientific approaches to identify and utilize crop varieties resilient to local climate conditions.
- For example, the dissemination of drought-tolerant maize varieties in sub-Saharan Africa has benefitted millions of smallholder farmers.
Precision Irrigation
- Adopt precision irrigation techniques, such as drip and sprinkler systems, to maximize water use efficiency and minimize environmental impact.
Variable Rate Fertilization
- Implement variable rate fertilization using soil testing, remote sensing, and precision agriculture technologies to tailor fertilizer application to specific crop and field requirements.
Government Policy Reforms
- Initiate policy changes, including taxation, subsidies, and legislation, to mitigate hidden costs in agrifood systems.
| UPSC Previous Year Questions Prelims (2020) Q. Which of the following factors/policies were affecting the price of rice in India in the recent Past? Minimum Support Price Government’s trading Government’s stockpiling Consumer subsidies Select the correct answer using the code given below: (a) 1, 2 and 4 only (b) 1, 3 and 4 only (c) 2 and 3 only (d) 1, 2, 3 and 4 Ans: D Mains (2021) Q. What are the present challenges before crop diversification? How do emerging technologies provide an opportunity for crop diversification? |
Source: TH
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Q: What are implicit expenditures within agrifood systems?
Implicit expenditures in agrifood systems refer to the often overlooked and indirect financial costs associated with various aspects of agricultural production, distribution, and consumption. These costs are not immediately apparent but play a crucial role in the overall sustainability and resilience of the agrifood sector.
Q: How do implicit expenditures impact the overall economic sustainability of agrifood systems?
Implicit expenditures can significantly influence the economic sustainability of agrifood systems by introducing hidden costs related to environmental degradation, social impacts, and inefficiencies. Understanding and addressing these implicit costs are essential for developing strategies that enhance the overall financial viability of the agrifood sector.
Q: What are examples of implicit expenditures in agrifood systems?
Examples of implicit expenditures include environmental externalities such as soil erosion and water pollution, social costs related to labor conditions, and hidden expenses within supply chains. Exploring these examples helps in comprehending the broader financial landscape of agrifood systems.
Q: How can a better understanding of implicit expenditures contribute to sustainable agricultural practices?
A deeper understanding of implicit expenditures allows stakeholders in agrifood systems to make informed decisions that promote sustainability. By identifying and quantifying hidden costs, it becomes possible to implement practices that reduce negative impacts, enhance resource efficiency, and ultimately contribute to the long-term sustainability of agriculture.
Q: Why is it important to go beyond traditional accounting methods when analyzing implicit expenditures?
Traditional accounting methods may not capture the full extent of implicit expenditures within agrifood systems. Going beyond conventional approaches is essential to uncover hidden costs and assess the broader economic, environmental, and social implications. This holistic analysis provides a more accurate picture of the true expenses associated with agrifood production and distribution.
In case you still have your doubts, contact us on 9811333901.
For UPSC Prelims Resources, Click here
For Daily Updates and Study Material:
Join our Telegram Channel – Edukemy for IAS
- 1. Learn through Videos – here
- 2. Be Exam Ready by Practicing Daily MCQs – here
- 3. Daily Newsletter – Get all your Current Affairs Covered – here
- 4. Mains Answer Writing Practice – here
