Regionalism often poses a question concerning the role played by Indian federalism in ensuring India’s unity, stability, and survival as a polity.
Persistent regionalism, sometimes coming on the verge of separation, is rooted in manifold and complex cultural, economic, and geographical issues as have been discussed before. The question around the role of Federalism in India assumes special significance when looking at the historical examples of the Balkanisation of several large states in the past.
For instance, the disintegration of the multi-ethnic and multi-national Soviet Union, and the split up of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia are some examples.
The need for federalism becomes all the more important in countries with ethnically distinct regions where the territorial accommodation of distinct groups of people is of paramount importance.
Such countries may utilise a combination of shared rule (analogous to a Union Government) and some kind of self-rule (for regional/local governance) to maintain unity and Integrity.
India’s diverse culture might seem like a challenge to staying united. However, by sticking to democracy, India has consistently shown its ability to solve disagreements peacefully and through democratic means. This has helped turn its diversity into a strength.
However, a few suggestive measures can still be followed to further strengthen the same:
- Doing away with regional imbalance
- Check on regional political parties
- Top priority to the economic development of deprived zones
- Restructuring of the society
- Acculturation
- Developed means of transport and communication
- Proper education
- Create enough growth and employment opportunities
- Special attention to backward states
- Improve National Integration
Clashes related to Regionalism in India
- Linguistic Reorganization of States: In the beginning, Potti Sriramulu demanded the creation of the Andhra state. Later, in 1956, it was renamed Andhra Pradesh. His demand was based on language as a foundation for forming states. When Sriramulu passed away, Jawaharlal Nehru, in response to similar demands from various regions, agreed to them. As a result, in 1954, a States Reorganisation Committee was established. This committee suggested the formation of 16 new states and 3 Union Territories based on language.
- Demand for Dravida Nadu: Dravidian Movement started in Tamil Nadu in 1925. This movement, also known as ‘Self-Respect Movement’ initially focused on empowering Dalits,non-Brahmins, and poor people. Later it stood against imposition of Hindi as sole official language on non-Hindi speaking areas. But it was the demand of carving out their own Dravidastan or Dravida Nadu, which made it a secessionist movement. As early as 1960s the DMK and the Nan Tamil organized a joint campaign throughout Madras state demanding its secession from India and making it an independent sovereign state of Tamiland. DM proposed that the states of Madras, Andhra Pradesh, Kerala and Mysore should secede from the Indian union and form an independent “Republic of Dravida Nadu”.
- Telangana Movement: In the years after the formation of the Andhra Pradesh, people of Telangana expressed dissatisfaction over how the agreements and guarantees were implemented. Discontent with the 1956 Gentleman’s agreement intensified in January 1969, when the guarantees that had been agreed on were supposed to lapse. Student agitation for the continuation of the agreement began at Osmania University in Hyderabad and spread to other parts of the region. Government employees and opposition members of the state legislative assembly threatened “direct action” in support of the students. This movement since then finally resulted in the creation of separate state of Telangana.
- Shiv Sena against Kannadigas: In 1966, Shiv Sena, in Maharashtra, launched its agitation against Kannadigas in the name of Marathi pride. The first targets of its agitation were South Indians who were the workers of Udupi hotels in Mumbai. This agitation was labelled to be a retaliation of the lathi-charge on Marathi speaking people in the border areas.
- Bodoland Demand within Assam: The Bodo agitation is led by the Assam Bodo Students Union which is demanding a separate state and has resorted to wide scale violence and series of crippling bandhs to pursue their demand. One of the basic reason for Assam agitations was due to the expansion of education, particularly higher education, but not industrialization and other job creating institutions thereby creating the army of educated youths in the backward regions. These frustrated young men are allured by the movements against the inflow of people from other countries and states. On the other hand these unemployed youths are also attracted by the caste, communal and other sectional agitations fighting for the protection of rights on sectarian lines.
- Khalistan Movement: It was during the era of 1980s that Khalistan movement with its aim to create a Sikh homeland, often called Khalistan, cropped up in the Punjab region of India and Pakistan. In fact this demand also had the colours of communalism, as the demand was only for Sikhs.
FAQs
1. What is regionalism?
Regionalism refers to the political, economic, or cultural integration of a specific geographic region, often driven by shared interests, identities, or concerns among its inhabitants. It can manifest in various forms, such as regional trade agreements, cultural alliances, or political movements advocating for regional autonomy or independence.
2. How does regionalism differ from federalism?
While both regionalism and federalism involve the organization of political entities within a larger framework, they differ in their scope and structure. Regionalism focuses on the interests and cooperation of specific regions within a country, aiming for greater autonomy or recognition of regional identity. Federalism, on the other hand, involves the division of powers between a central government and constituent political units (states or provinces), with each level possessing significant authority within its respective sphere.
3. What are the advantages of regionalism?
- Cultural Preservation: Regionalism can help preserve and promote unique cultural identities and traditions within specific geographic areas.
- Effective Governance: By decentralizing power and decision-making, regionalism can lead to more responsive governance that addresses local needs and concerns more effectively.
- Economic Development: Regional cooperation can stimulate economic growth by pooling resources, attracting investment, and fostering specialized industries that capitalize on regional strengths.
- Conflict Resolution: Recognizing regional differences and granting autonomy can mitigate tensions and conflicts arising from cultural, linguistic, or historical divides.
- Democratic Participation: Regionalism can enhance democratic participation by empowering local communities to have a greater say in governance and policy-making processes.
4. What are the challenges of regionalism?
- Fragmentation: Excessive regional autonomy may lead to fragmentation and weaken national cohesion, potentially hindering coordinated responses to national issues.
- Inequality: Regionalism could exacerbate disparities between regions, with wealthier or more developed areas gaining disproportionate benefits compared to less affluent regions.
- Inter-regional Conflicts: Competing interests among different regions may escalate into conflicts over resource allocation, political power, or territorial disputes.
- Coordination Issues: Ensuring coordination and cooperation among various regional entities while maintaining a functional national framework can pose logistical and administrative challenges.
- National Sovereignty Concerns: Strong regional identities and aspirations for autonomy may raise concerns about the erosion of national sovereignty and territorial integrity.
5. How do countries balance regionalism and federalism?
Countries often employ a mix of regionalism and federalism to balance the need for local autonomy with national unity and cohesion. This may involve devolving certain powers to regional governments while retaining others at the national level. Mechanisms such as constitutional arrangements, intergovernmental agreements, and fiscal transfers are used to manage relations between the central government and regional entities. Flexibility and adaptation to evolving socio-political dynamics are crucial in maintaining a stable and inclusive governance framework that accommodates both regional diversity and national unity.
In case you still have your doubts, contact us on 9811333901.
For UPSC Prelims Resources, Click here
For Daily Updates and Study Material:
Join our Telegram Channel – Edukemy for IAS
- 1. Learn through Videos – here
- 2. Be Exam Ready by Practicing Daily MCQs – here
- 3. Daily Newsletter – Get all your Current Affairs Covered – here
- 4. Mains Answer Writing Practice – here
