What are the direct and indirect subsidies provided to the farm sector in India? Discuss the issues raised by the World Trade Organization (WTO) in relation to agricultural subsidies. (15 Marks,250 Words)

The agricultural sector in India, vital for the country’s economy and food security, receives significant support through both direct and indirect subsidies. Direct subsidies include financial assistance, such as input subsidies, irrigation subsidies, and credit facilities provided by the government to farmers. These subsidies aim to reduce the cost burden on farmers, increase agricultural productivity, and ensure food affordability for consumers. Additionally, indirect subsidies are provided through price support mechanisms like minimum support prices (MSP), where the government purchases agricultural produce at predetermined prices to stabilize market prices and safeguard farmer incomes. However, these subsidies have raised concerns at the World Trade Organization (WTO). The WTO argues that such subsidies distort global trade by artificially inflating production levels, leading to oversupply and market disruptions. Moreover, they allege that these subsidies unfairly disadvantage farmers in other countries who cannot compete with the artificially lowered prices of subsidized Indian agricultural products. The WTO’s stance has sparked debates over the compatibility of India’s agricultural policies with international trade regulations, highlighting the need for reforms to ensure a fair and equitable global trading system while balancing the interests of domestic farmers and consumers.

Answer:      

Introduction:      

The government provides both direct and indirect subsidies as aid to support farmers and boost agricultural production. According to the Ministry of agriculture and farmer welfare, subsidies constitute about 2% of India’s GDP. However, these subsidies have often come under scrutiny from the World Trade Organization (WTO) due to concerns about their impact on global trade. 

The issue raised by the World Trade Organisation (WTO) about agricultural subsidies is as follows:- 

1. Market Distortion: Agricultural subsidies artificially lower production costs, causing overproduction of subsidised crops, depressing prices, and hindering global competitiveness. Example: US corn subsidies create a global surplus, depressing corn prices and hindering foreign farmers’ competitiveness. 
2. Unfair Competition: Subsidies grant an unfair advantage to domestic farmers, making their products cheaper.This undermines competitors, particularly in developing nations without similar resources. Example: EU dairy subsidies enable cheaper milk and cheese production, unfairly competing with dairy producers in other nations. 
3. Trade Barriers: Subsidies can impose conditions that restrict imports, hindering foreign market access and impacting exporting economies.Example: Japanese rice subsidies and quotas obstruct foreign rice exports, creating trade barriers for outside competition. 
4. Reduced Incentive for Efficiency: Subsidies can reduce the motivation to improve productivity and cut costs, hindering innovation and sustainability in agriculture.Example: Brazilian sugar subsidies deter efficiency improvements in sugarcane farming, reducing productivity and cost-effectiveness. 

5. Environmental Concerns: Some subsidies promote environmentally harmful practices, like excessive resource use and deforestation, exacerbating global environmental challenges. Example: Subsidised palm oil production in Southeast Asia leads to deforestation and environmental damage, including biodiversity loss and increased carbon emissions 
6. Distorted Global Food Prices: Subsidies can lead to price volatility and affect food security in both import and export-dependent countries. Example: Indian wheat and rice subsidies cause significant price fluctuations in global food markets when India releases subsidised grain stocks. 
7. Impact on Developing Countries: Heavily subsidised agricultural exports from wealthier nations harm the competitiveness of developing countries, especially those reliant on agriculture.Example: US cotton subsidies depress global cotton prices, harming cotton-producing countries in West Africa, which rely on cotton exports for income. 
8. Legal Challenges in WTO: The WTO’s Agreement on Agriculture leads to disputes and negotiations over subsidy rules, often brought before the WTO’s dispute settlement body. Example: Brazil and the US engaged in a WTO dispute over cotton subsidies, highlighting the use of the dispute settlement mechanism to address subsidy violations. 
9. Public stockholding: India’s food stockpiling  for domestic food security purposes and putting restrictions on exports has been a contentious issue raised by the WTO leading to food security issues. Ex- restricting wheat export at the time of Russia- Ukraine crisis. 

Way forward:    

1. Negotiations and Reform: Encourage ongoing WTO talks to reform subsidies, revising rules in the Agreement on Agriculture for clearer limits on trade-distorting subsidies. 
2. Transparency: Improve subsidy reporting and monitoring, making it mandatory for WTO members to provide detailed, up-to-date subsidy information for better oversight. 
3. Special Treatment for Developing Countries: Recognize developing nations’ unique circumstances, offering gradual subsidy reduction flexibility to avoid abrupt agricultural disruptions. 
4. Green Subsidies: Promote eco-friendly, non-trade-distorting “green box” subsidies for sustainable agriculture and positive environmental outcomes. 
5. Targeted Assistance: Shift subsidies towards support for small-scale farmers, rural development, and food security, with a focus on aiding developing countries. 
6. Bilateral and Regional Agreements: Encourage regional and bilateral trade deals to address agricultural subsidies as part of negotiations, complementing WTO efforts. 
7. Global Collaboration: Promote global cooperation on subsidy policies, aligning with international initiatives like the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the Paris Agreement on climate change. 

Conclusion:     

Thus, agriculture, the backbone of India’s economy and a significant source of employment relies on subsidies to ensure food security and farmer welfare. India must advocate for fair trade rules that address the unique challenges faced by developing countries in agriculture, navigating complexities to safeguard both farmer welfare and global compliance. 

In case you still have your doubts, contact us on 9811333901. 

For UPSC Prelims Resources, Click here

For Daily Updates and Study Material:

Join our Telegram Channel – Edukemy for IAS

• 1. Learn through Videos – here
• 2. Be Exam Ready by Practicing Daily MCQs – here
• 3. Daily Newsletter – Get all your Current Affairs Covered – here
• 4. Mains Answer Writing Practice – here

Visit our YouTube Channel – here