A case study is a comprehensive and in-depth examination of a particular subject, often within its real-life context. It serves as a methodological tool to explore, analyze, and understand complex issues or phenomena, ranging from individual experiences to organizational challenges. Typically employed in various academic disciplines, business settings, and scientific research, a case study involves an extensive investigation that aims to provide a detailed account of the subject under scrutiny. By delving into the intricate details of a specific case, researchers can uncover valuable insights, draw conclusions, and offer practical solutions. This method offers a holistic approach, allowing for a nuanced understanding of the multifaceted factors influencing the subject, making it an invaluable tool for gaining knowledge and informing decision-making processes.
Q11. You are a no-nonsense, honest officer. You have been transferred to a remote district to head a department that is notorious for its inefficiency and callousness. You find that the main cause of the poor state of affairs is the indiscipline of a section of employees. They do not work themselves and also disrupt the working of others. You first warned the troublemakers to mend their ways or else face disciplinary action. When the warning had little effect, you issued a show cause notice to the ringleaders. As a retaliatory measure, these troublemakers instigated a woman employee amongst them to file a complaint of sexual harassment against you with the Women’s Commission. The Commission promptly seeks your explanation. The matter is also publicized in the media to embarrass you further. Some of the options to handle this situation could be as follows:
- Give your explanation to the Commission and go soft on the disciplinary action.
- Ignore the Commission and proceed firmly with the disciplinary action.
- Brief your higher-ups, seek directions from them and act accordingly.
Suggest any other possible option(s). Evaluate all of them and suggest the best course of action, giving your reasons for it. (250 Words, 20 Marks)
Tags: Case Studies
Decoding the Question:
Answer:
Case Summary:
Being an honest officer, I have been transferred to a remote district to head a department where the employees are notorious and inefficient. After taking a disciplinary action against them, they tried to subdue me by filing a fictitious grievance of sexual harassment by a female employee with Women’s Commission. The Commission seeks my clarification. The matter is also published in the media.
Stakeholders involved in the case:
- I am the head of a department.
- Section of employees in the department who are undisciplined and inefficient.
- A women employee, being instigated by troublemakers to file a complaint of sexual harassment against me.
- Women’s Commission.
An evaluation of options available to me:
Give my explanation to the Commission and go soft on the disciplinary action:
- Giving my explanation to the commission and going soft on disciplinary action prevents personal harm by clarifying facts of the case to the commission. Moreover, responding to a call of the commission exhibits a sense of my transparency and accountability.
- It will maintain a good public image in the media and also shows sensitivity towards women and women issues.
Ignore the Commission and proceed firmly with the disciplinary action:
- The officer cannot ignore the Commission which is a legally constituted authority. It will be an act of indiscipline which may amount to defiance.
- Moreover, doing duty to maintain departmental efficiency by continuing with the departmental enquiry fulfills the moral responsibility of checking wrongdoing.
Brief your higher-ups, seek directions from them and act accordingly:
- There is no harm in informing senior officers and taking their advice.
- It is better to keep the senior officers in the loop so that they may not form any false impressions. They are likely to give me practical and correct advice.
- But the Commission’s notice arose due to a complaint against the officer inconsequence of his official action. So, finally he has to answer the Commission. However,
Appeal to close friend:
- One other possibility is to appeal to the good friend or some one who is very close to the employee either directly or through other reliable persons to withdraw the false complaint. I should tell her to be truthful and not misuse the law.
Reply to the commission’s notice, brief higher-ups about the incident and continue disciplinary action:
Preventing personal harm by clarifying the case to the commission, responding to calls of the commission, ensuring effective communication with seniors and doing duty to maintain departmental efficiency by continuing with the departmental inquiry.
Hence, the last option is the holistic course of action with least possible demerits. With this option I can fulfill all my obligations, reply to authority of the Commission, take seniors into assurance as well as minimizing personal harm. It could still lead to personal harm as the case of sexual harassment may cause emotional stress to me as well as my family and may also affect my record.
In case you still have your doubts, contact us on 9811333901.
For UPSC Prelims Resources, Click here
For Daily Updates and Study Material:
Join our Telegram Channel – Edukemy for IAS
- 1. Learn through Videos – here
- 2. Be Exam Ready by Practicing Daily MCQs – here
- 3. Daily Newsletter – Get all your Current Affairs Covered – here
- 4. Mains Answer Writing Practice – here
