The Reservation Policy Debate stands as a contentious discourse at the intersection of social justice, governance, and identity politics. Rooted in the complexities of historical discrimination and contemporary calls for equitable representation, this debate traverses a landscape fraught with diverging perspectives and deep-seated emotions. At its core lies the question of whether reservation policies, aimed at providing affirmative action to historically marginalized communities, serve as a necessary corrective measure or perpetuate societal divisions. As societies grapple with the multifaceted implications of such policies on meritocracy, social cohesion, and economic development, the discourse surrounding reservations emerges as a crucial arena for navigating the complexities of justice and equality in diverse and often unequal societies.
The Reservation Policy Debate
Reservation in India is all about reserving access to seats in government jobs, educational institutions, and even legislatures to certain sections of the population. Also known as affirmative action, the reservation can also be seen as positive discrimination.
Judicial Examination of Reservation Policies
The landmark case of State of Madras v. Smt. Champakam Dorairajan (1951) marked the Supreme Court’s initial scrutiny of reservation issues, prompting the First Amendment in the constitution. The court highlighted the absence of provisions for reservations in Article 15, which applied to employment under the State, leading to the amendment of Article 15 by inserting Clause (4).
In the case of Indra Sawhney v. Union of India (1992), the court delved into the scope of Article 16(4). It articulated that the “creamy layer” of Other Backward Classes (OBCs) should be excluded from reservation benefits, advocated against reservations in promotions, and imposed a cap of 50% on the total reserved quota. Responding to this, the Parliament enacted the 77th Constitutional Amendment, introducing Article 16(4A). This article empowers the state to reserve seats in promotions for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) if they are inadequately represented in public employment.
In the case of M. Nagaraj v. Union Of India (2006), the Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of Article 16(4A) and established three essential constitutional requirements for any reservation policy to be valid:
- The SC and ST communities must be socially and educationally backward.
- Inadequate representation of SC and ST communities in public employment.
- The reservation policy should not compromise the overall efficiency of the administration.
The Jarnail Singh vs Lachhmi Narain Gupta case (2018) clarified that reservation in promotions doesn’t necessitate the state to gather quantifiable data on the backwardness of SCs and STs. The court also affirmed that creamy layer exclusion applies to SC/STs, barring the state from granting promotions with reservations to individuals from the creamy layer.
In May 2019, the Supreme Court upheld the Karnataka law allowing reservations in promotions for SCs and STs with consequential seniority, demonstrating a nuanced approach to the evolving landscape of reservation policies.
Mandal Commission:
- Formation and Mandate:
- In December 1978, the President appointed the Mandal Commission under the chairmanship of B. P. Mandal, utilizing Article 340 of the Constitution.
- The commission aimed to define criteria for identifying “socially and educationally backward classes” in India and propose measures for their advancement.
- Population Analysis:
- Mandal Commission’s findings indicated that around 52% of India’s population belonged to Other Backward Classes (OBCs).
- Recommended a 27% reservation in government jobs for OBCs.
- Indicators of Backwardness:
- Developed eleven indicators encompassing social, educational, and economic aspects to gauge backwardness.
- Inclusivity Beyond Hindus:
- Identified backward classes not only among Hindus but also among non-Hindus (Muslims, Sikhs, Christians, Buddhists).
- Compiled an all-India list of Other Backward Classes (OBCs) consisting of 3,743 castes and a more disadvantaged “depressed backward classes” list with 2,108 castes.
- Supreme Court Validation (Indra Sawhney Case – 1992):
- Upheld the 27% quota for backward classes while striking down the reservation of 10% government jobs for economically backward classes among higher castes.
- Established the principle that the total reservation beneficiaries should not exceed 50% of India’s population.
- Introduced the concept of ‘creamy layer’ and restricted reservation for backward classes to initial appointments, excluding promotions.
- Recent Development (Constitutional Amendment – 2019):
- Constitutional (103rd Amendment) Act in 2019 provided 10% reservation in government jobs and educational institutions for the “economically backward” in the unreserved category.
- Amended Articles 15 and 16 of the Constitution, allowing the government to grant reservation based on economic backwardness, exceeding the 50% cap.
Critique of Reservation Policies:
- Workplace Divisions: Reservation in state services is criticized for fostering divisions and enmity among government employees, negatively impacting the work environment.
- Perpetuation of Caste: While the initial goal was to eradicate caste-based discrimination, opponents argue that Caste-Based Reservation perpetuates caste distinctions in society.
- Continued Social Disadvantage: Despite economic progress, historically underprivileged communities are said to remain socially disadvantaged, suggesting that reservation might not have achieved its intended outcome.
- Undermining Meritocracy: Critics contend that reservations undermine the principle of meritocracy, shifting the focus from selecting the best candidates to emphasizing those deemed the most backward.
- Political Exploitation: Reservation is accused of being exploited for narrow political ends, invoking class loyalties and primordial identities for political gain.
- Elite Appropriation: The benefits of reservation are criticized for being appropriated by the dominant and elite segments within backward castes, leaving the most marginalized individuals within these groups still marginalized.
- Mechanism of Exclusion: Reservation, intended for inclusion, is argued to have turned into a mechanism of exclusion. Some economically disadvantaged individuals from upper castes claim to face discrimination and injustice.
- Social Frustration: Reservation policies are said to breed frustration in society, especially when perceived as a source of discrimination against certain groups, even among economically deprived sections of upper castes.
Factors Driving the Growing Demand for Reservation:
- Remedy for Developmental Imbalances: There is a growing perception that reservation serves as a corrective measure for the negative consequences of poorly planned development policies.
- Challenges in Developed States: Even in economically developed states such as Haryana, Gujarat, and Maharashtra, concerns persist over issues like severe agrarian distress, limited job growth, and distortions in the development trajectory.
- Economic Stagnation: The presence of acute agrarian distress and a stagnation in employment opportunities creates an environment where advocating for reservation becomes a seemingly simpler solution for the government.
- Compensation for Unprivileged Upper Castes: The rising demand for reservation among upper castes can be attributed to a fear of losing privilege and a struggle to adapt to changing socio-economic dynamics.
- Perceived Disadvantage in Government Jobs: Upper castes express a sense of disadvantage, particularly in the context of government employment, citing a lack of similar advantages enjoyed by backward classes.
- Inequality in Opportunities: The inability of upper castes to access comparable benefits in various spheres, particularly employment, contributes to the call for reservation as a means to address perceived disparities.
- Resistance to Change: As societal dynamics shift, upper castes may resist these changes, further fueling demands for reservation as a protective measure against perceived loss of opportunities.
FAQs
Q: What is the reservation policy?
The reservation policy in India refers to the system of affirmative action where certain quotas or reservations are allocated for historically disadvantaged groups, primarily Scheduled Castes (SC), Scheduled Tribes (ST), and Other Backward Classes (OBC), in education, government jobs, and political representation.
Q: Why was the reservation policy implemented?
The reservation policy was introduced to address historical injustices, social discrimination, and economic disparities faced by marginalized communities. It aims to provide opportunities for these communities to access education, employment, and political representation, thereby promoting equality and social justice.
Q: What are the arguments in favor of the reservation policy?
Proponents argue that reservation is necessary to uplift marginalized communities by providing them with equal opportunities in education and employment. It helps in breaking the cycle of discrimination and poverty, promotes diversity and inclusivity, and contributes to social harmony and nation-building.
Q: What are the criticisms against the reservation policy?
Critics argue that reservation leads to reverse discrimination, meritocracy is compromised, and it perpetuates caste-based identities rather than fostering a casteless society. There are concerns about inefficiency and corruption in the implementation of reservation policies, and it’s often blamed for creating resentment and tensions among different social groups.
Q: What are the proposed alternatives or reforms to the reservation policy?
Some suggestions include implementing economic criteria instead of caste-based reservations, focusing on improving the quality of education and healthcare for marginalized communities, promoting skill development and entrepreneurship, and ensuring transparency and accountability in the reservation system. Additionally, there are calls for periodic reviews and adjustments to the reservation quotas based on evolving socio-economic indicators.
In case you still have your doubts, contact us on 9811333901.
For UPSC Prelims Resources, Click here
For Daily Updates and Study Material:
Join our Telegram Channel – Edukemy for IAS
- 1. Learn through Videos – here
- 2. Be Exam Ready by Practicing Daily MCQs – here
- 3. Daily Newsletter – Get all your Current Affairs Covered – here
- 4. Mains Answer Writing Practice – here
