In the dynamic landscape of the workplace, understanding the distinctions between coercion and undue influence is crucial for fostering a healthy and equitable work environment. Coercion involves the exertion of pressure or threats to compel an individual to act against their will, often resulting in a lack of genuine consent. This can manifest in various forms, such as threats of termination or withholding of benefits to coerce an employee into working overtime or accepting unfavorable conditions. On the other hand, undue influence pertains to the manipulation or exploitation of a person’s vulnerability or dependence to gain an unfair advantage. Unlike coercion, undue influence may not involve explicit threats but relies on subtle persuasion or exploitation of power differentials. An example of undue influence in the workplace could be a supervisor exploiting their authority to persuade a subordinate into disclosing confidential information by exploiting their fear of repercussions or desire for approval. Understanding these distinctions is essential for promoting ethical conduct and fostering a workplace culture built on respect, trust, and genuine consent.
Answer
A positive work environment is the one which is democratic, inspiring and motivating. However, many times organisations resort to coercion and undue influence which aim at influencing the others. The two terms differ in following manner –
| Coercion | Undue influence |
| It involves the use of force, threats, or intimidation to make someone do something against their will. | It refers to situations where one party takes advantage of their position of power or authority to exploit another party’s vulnerability, leading to the unfair manipulation of the decision-making process. |
| It often implies the presence of explicit punishment for non-compliance. | It is more subtle and involves psychological pressure. |
| e.g. A supervisor threatening to fire an employee if they don’t work overtime without proper compensation. | e.g. A supervisor exploits a close relationship with a subordinate to persuade them to reveal confidential information about their colleagues’ performance. |
| It can lead to a hostile and fear-driven work environment. It erodes trust, damages morale resulting in reduced employee satisfaction and productivity. | It can undermine fair decision-making processes in the workplace and can lead to unfair, biased practices, and conflicts of interest. |
| The aggrieved party must provide direct proof, such as recorded threats or witness testimonies. | Here the dominant party in the relationship often needs to prove their actions were just, like showing correspondence to demonstrate there was no undue pressure. |
Both coercion and undue influence can be detrimental to the well-being of individuals and the overall health of a workplace. Organisations should prioritise creating a transparent and ethical work culture that discourages such practices and encourages open communication and fairness.
In case you still have your doubts, contact us on 9811333901.
For UPSC Prelims Resources, Click here
For Daily Updates and Study Material:
Join our Telegram Channel – Edukemy for IAS
- 1. Learn through Videos – here
- 2. Be Exam Ready by Practicing Daily MCQs – here
- 3. Daily Newsletter – Get all your Current Affairs Covered – here
- 4. Mains Answer Writing Practice – here
