India’s engagement with the WTO, particularly concerning the Amber Box subsidies, has been a topic of contention. The Amber Box includes subsidies considered trade-distorting, and WTO imposes limits on such support.
Key Points:
- Minimum Support Price (MSP) Program:
- India operates a Minimum Support Price (MSP) program, where the government pays farmers for the grains they sell, supporting agriculture investment, ensuring food security, and stabilizing prices.
- WTO Cap on Subsidy:
- WTO imposes a cap on the subsidy, limiting the amount a country can provide. India argues against the limitation and questions the calculation methodology.
- The calculation is based on a 1986-88 base year, with restricted allowances for inflation since then. India contends that the base year does not accurately reflect the changes in input prices, leading to a discrepancy in subsidy calculations.
- Peace Clause:
- A temporary ‘Peace Clause’ was introduced at the WTO Bali conference in 2013. This clause temporarily shields countries from legal challenges if their subsidies breach WTO obligations.
- The Peace Clause was meant to be an interim arrangement, and a permanent solution was to be negotiated by 2017. However, the clause has been extended indefinitely until a satisfactory permanent solution is in place.
- The Peace Clause ensures that countries, including India, can continue their food security programs without legal challenges, even if the subsidies exceed WTO limits.
India advocates for a fair and accurate calculation of subsidies, considering the actual economic conditions and inflation rates. The issue reflects the complexities in aligning global trade rules with the diverse economic and agricultural conditions of individual nations. The quest for a permanent solution continues within the WTO framework.
FAQs
1. What are Amber Box subsidies, and how do they relate to India?
- Amber Box subsidies are domestic support measures under the WTO Agreement on Agriculture. They are considered trade-distorting and subject to reduction commitments. India has utilized various subsidies, particularly in agriculture, falling under the Amber Box category.
2. What agricultural sectors in India benefit from Amber Box subsidies?
- India’s agricultural sector, including crops like rice, wheat, sugarcane, and cotton, has benefited from various subsidies classified under the Amber Box. These subsidies aim to support farmers, stabilize prices, and ensure food security.
3. How do Amber Box subsidies impact India’s international trade relations?
- India’s use of Amber Box subsidies has often been a point of contention in international trade negotiations. Other countries argue that these subsidies distort global agricultural markets by artificially inflating production and affecting prices, disadvantaging farmers in other nations.
4. What is India’s stance on reducing Amber Box subsidies?
- India has defended its use of Amber Box subsidies, citing the need to support its vast rural population and ensure food security. However, it has also expressed willingness to engage in negotiations for subsidy reduction under the WTO framework, provided there is equitable treatment for developing countries.
5. How does India balance its domestic agricultural needs with its international trade commitments regarding Amber Box subsidies?
- India faces the challenge of balancing its domestic agricultural priorities, such as ensuring food security and supporting farmers, with its commitments to international trade agreements. This requires careful policy formulation and negotiation strategies to safeguard both national interests and comply with global trade rules.
In case you still have your doubts, contact us on 9811333901.
For UPSC Prelims Resources, Click here
For Daily Updates and Study Material:
Join our Telegram Channel – Edukemy for IAS
- 1. Learn through Videos – here
- 2. Be Exam Ready by Practicing Daily MCQs – here
- 3. Daily Newsletter – Get all your Current Affairs Covered – here
- 4. Mains Answer Writing Practice – here
