Law and ethics stand as twin pillars in the realm of human behavior, serving as essential tools that shape and regulate conduct to foster a harmonious and civilized social existence. These interconnected frameworks provide the scaffolding upon which societies construct their norms, values, and expectations. While law establishes a formalized set of rules backed by institutional authority, ethics delves into the moral principles that guide individuals in making decisions and navigating complex situations. Together, law and ethics create a dynamic interplay that seeks to balance the pursuit of justice, individual rights, and communal well-being, contributing to the fabric of a just and orderly society. As humanity grapples with the complexities of coexistence, the synergy between law and ethics becomes increasingly crucial for fostering a community where individuals can thrive while upholding shared values.
Q: Law and ethics are considered to be the two tools for controlling human conduct to make it conducive to civilized social existence.
(a) Discuss how they achieve this objective.
(b) Giving examples, show how the two differ in their approaches. (150 Words,10 Marks)
(a) Discuss how they achieve this objective.
Tag: Ethics and Human Interface: Essence, determinants and consequences of Ethics in-human actions; dimensions of ethics; ethics in private and public relationships.
Decoding the Question:
- In Introduction, try to define law and ethics.
- In Body, show the difference between the two and their importance.
- Try to conclude with different domains of law and ethics.
Answer:
A harmonious relation between law and ethics is good for the wellbeing and development of individuals as well as society. They control human conduct and make it more socially acceptable. Many times the term law is juxtaposed with the term ethics, but there is a difference, as ethics are the principles that guide a person or society, created to decide what is good or bad, right or wrong, in a given situation. It regulates a person’s behaviour or conduct and helps an individual in living a good life, by applying the moral rules and guidelines.
They achieve their objectives through:
- They both set standards for right and wrong for individuals as well as society.
- Laws have legal backing. Breaking of law provides punishment. So, It controls the human behaviour for more acceptable and civilized behaviour
- Similarly, Ethics have many controlling options like boycott from society to control
- human behaviour.
- Both law and ethics promote the wellbeing and development of society. There are laws to control the purchase and sale of intoxicating Substance.There are laws to protect and empower women.
- Ethics and law also award socially acceptable behaviour through social recognition and social respect.
Ethics and laws are found in virtually all spheres of society. Both govern the actions of individuals around the world on a daily basis. They often work hand-in-hand to ensure that citizens act in a certain manner, and likewise coordinate efforts to protect the health, safety and welfare of the public. Though law often embodies ethical principles, law and ethics are not coextensive.
Based on society’s ethics, laws are created and enforced by governments to mediate relationships with each other, and to protect its citizens. While laws carry with them a punishment for violations, ethics do not. Essentially, laws enforce the behaviors citizens are expected to follow, while ethics suggest what ought to follow, and help to explore options to improve the decision-making.
(b) Giving examples, show how the two differ in their approaches.
Tag: Ethics and Human Interface: Essence, determinants and consequences of Ethics in-human actions; dimensions of ethics; ethics in private and public relationships.
Decoding the Question:
- In Introduction, try to write about Ethical decision-making and Laws and how codifications of certain ethical values meant to help regulate society.
- In Body, emphasis on Laws and Ethics Differ in Their Approaches.
- In Conclusion, try to conclude with Rousseau’s social contract theory.
Answer:
Ethical decision-making comes from within a person’s moral sense and desire to preserve self-respect. Laws are codifications of certain ethical values meant to help regulate society, and also impact decision-making. Driving carefully, for example, because somebody should not get hurt is making a decision based on ethical principles. Driving carefully and within the speed limit because of a police car behind suggests fear of breaking the law and being punished for it.
Laws and Ethics Differ in Their Approaches:
- Laws and Ethics are not always having a clear delineation though. Many actions that would be widely condemned as unethical are not prohibited by law.
- Laws are rules developed by governments in order to provide balance in society and protection to its citizens. Ethics are standards developed by society or organizations to judge what is right and what is wrong. Like sitting on metro seats reserved for women is both unethical as well as illegal.
- Ethics are enforced through people’s awareness of what is right and wrong. Laws are enforced by governments to its people.
- Ethics does not carry any direct and codified punishment to anyone who violates it. However, the law will punish anyone who happens to violate it.
- Ethics are subjective, whereas laws are relatively objective.
- Rousseau argues that now some have property and others are forced to work for them, consequently, the development of social classes begins. Eventually, those who have property notice that it would be in their interests to create a way that would protect private property from those who do not have it (as they can see the possibility it can be acquired by force). So, law, i.e. government, gets established, and ethics (and decision-making) is formalized through a type of “social contract.”
Rousseau’s social contract theory may form a single, consistent view of the reasons for conflict and competition from which modern society suffers. Humans are born with freedom and equality by nature, but this nature has been corrupted by contingent social history. one can overcome this “corruption,” however, by reconstituting with new laws and agreements guided by ethical decision-making that is good for individual and collective mass.
In case you still have your doubts, contact us on 9811333901.
For UPSC Prelims Resources, Click here
For Daily Updates and Study Material:
Join our Telegram Channel – Edukemy for IAS
- 1. Learn through Videos – here
- 2. Be Exam Ready by Practicing Daily MCQs – here
- 3. Daily Newsletter – Get all your Current Affairs Covered – here
- 4. Mains Answer Writing Practice – here
