Legalizing same-sex marriage represents a profound stride toward equality and inclusivity within society. By extending the fundamental right to marry to all individuals, regardless of sexual orientation, governments acknowledge the inherent dignity and worth of every person. Such legislation not only affirms the love and commitment shared by same-sex couples but also fosters a more just and tolerant society. Moreover, legalizing same-sex marriage has far-reaching implications beyond the realm of personal relationships, impacting issues ranging from healthcare and taxation to parental rights and societal attitudes. As countries around the world grapple with this issue, the conversation surrounding the legalization of same-sex marriage underscores the ongoing struggle for human rights and social progress.
Supreme Court Rulings on the Right to Marry:
1. NALSA Judgment (2014):
- Recognized and affirmed the fundamental rights of transgender people, establishing a legal precedent for their rights.
2. KS Puttaswamy vs. Union of India (2017):
- Upheld the fundamental right to privacy, reinforcing individual autonomy and personal space.
3. Navtej Singh Johar vs. Union of India (2018):
- Decriminalized homosexuality by striking down Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), marking a historic step towards LGBTQIA+ rights.
4. Shafin Jahan vs. Union of India:
- Acknowledged the right to choose one’s partner as a facet of the fundamental right to liberty and dignity.
5. Shakti Vahini vs. Union of India:
- Recognized the right to choose a life partner as a fundamental right, emphasizing individual autonomy in personal relationships.
6. Deepika Singh vs. Central Administrative Tribunal:
- Acknowledged the existence of “atypical” families, including queer (LGBTQ) marriages, breaking away from traditional parenting roles.
Recent Judgment:
- In a 3:2 verdict, the Supreme Court declined to grant legal status to same-sex marriages, emphasizing that while Indians are free to engage in same-sex relationships with constitutional protection, marriage itself remains prohibited.
SMA Interpretation:
- The court clarified its inability to interpret the Special Marriage Act (SMA) to include same-sex couples, citing the legislative objective of the law and its focus on heterosexual unions.
State Regulation:
- In the absence of a central law, the judgment emphasized that State legislatures have the authority to enact laws recognizing and regulating same-sex marriages under Articles 245 and 246 of the Constitution.
Adoption and Entitlements:
- Noted the discriminatory nature of current adoption regulations towards the queer community but refrained from striking down existing restrictions. The Union Government committed to forming a committee to determine benefits and entitlements for individuals in queer unions, recognizing the need to address discrimination in adoption and entitlements.
Natal Family Violence and Protection:
- Recognizing “atypical families,” the Chief Justice directed the police not to compel queer individuals to return to their families, acknowledging the unique challenges faced by such families and the importance of protection against violence.
Arguments Opposing Same-Sex Marriage:
1. Religious Foundations of Marriage:
- Many religions have traditionally defined marriage as a union between a man and a woman. The creation of the Special Marriage Act, 1954 aimed to address limitations within religious personal laws, not to establish a new form of marriage.
2. Legitimate State Interest:
- The state holds a legitimate interest in regulating marriages and personal relationships, as evidenced by laws concerning age of consent, prohibited degrees of marriage, and divorce. The right to marry is not absolute and is subject to state laws, similar to other areas where the state regulates personal decisions.
3. Right to Privacy and Public Element of Marriage:
- While the Supreme Court recognizes the right to privacy and protects sexual orientation from discrimination, marriage is viewed as having a necessary public aspect. Privacy rights, while crucial, do not extend to marriage, which inherently involves public recognition and legal obligations.
4. Legislative Authority of Parliament:
- The authority to decide on same-sex marriage rests with Parliament, emphasizing that democratic processes should shape such significant societal matters. Concerns include potential unintended legal consequences and the complexity of addressing various gender identities within the LGBTQIA+ community.
5. Interpretation of Existing Laws:
- The Special Marriage Act (SMA) may not be readily interpretable to include same-sex marriage, as it would necessitate a comprehensive examination of the Act’s entire structure. Issues may arise in determining specific rights within a same-sex marriage, potentially disrupting existing legal frameworks.
6. Gendered Terminology Challenges:
- Arguments point out that gendered terms like ‘mother,’ ‘father,’ ‘husband,’ and ‘wife’ could pose challenges in same-sex marriages. The legal implications, such as specific rights provided to a wife under existing laws, become unclear and could create complications.
7. Adoption and Societal Stigma:
- Adoption by queer couples may be met with societal stigma and discrimination, potentially impacting the emotional and psychological well-being of adopted children. The argument is particularly relevant in a societal context where acceptance of the LGBTQIA+ community is not universally prevalent.
Arguments Supporting Same-Sex Marriage:
1. Surrogacy and Adoption:
- Arguing against the notion that same-sex marriage will threaten the human race, proponents highlight that adoption is a viable solution for queer couples wishing to raise children.
2. Marriage as a Fundamental Right:
- Advocates assert that marriage equality is a fundamental right, emphasizing that the demand for legal recognition comes from less economically privileged individuals who require legal protection. Stories like that of Leela and Urmila, two policewomen who faced discrimination in 1987, illustrate societal biases against the LGBTQIA+ community.
3. Extension of Special Marriage Act:
- Supporters propose extending the Special Marriage Act to include queer Indians, using gender-neutral language like “spouse” instead of “husband” or “wife.” This extension would provide equal marriage rights without the need for special considerations.
4. Cohabitation as a Fundamental Right:
- Referring to the acknowledgment by the Chief Justice of India (CJI) that cohabitation is a fundamental right, proponents argue for legal recognition of social relationships, suggesting alternative labels such as “contract” or “partnership” instead of “marriage.”
5. Assimilation of Same-Sex Couples:
- Advocates stress the importance of assimilating same-sex couples into society rather than marginalizing them. The decriminalization of Section 377 recognizes the existence of same-sex relationships, and the government should address practical issues faced by these couples.
6. Indian Culture and Value System:
- Recognizing the influence of social norms and obligations in India’s culturally rich society, proponents acknowledge the challenges posed by the acceptance of same-sex relationships. However, they argue that legal recognition adds to the diversity of relationships in society.
7. Human Dignity:
- Citing the Supreme Court’s decision in Navtej Singh Johar vs. Union of India, supporters emphasize that granting same-sex couples the freedom to lead a dignified private life is a matter of human dignity.
8. Biological Gender Complexity:
- The Supreme Court’s acknowledgment that biological gender is not absolute and that gender is more complex than mere genitals forms a basis for supporting same-sex marriage.
9. Denial of Rights to LGBTQIA+ Community:
- Advocates contend that the denial of legal benefits like tax benefits, medical rights, inheritance, and adoption to the LGBTQIA+ community due to the prohibition of same-sex marriage is unjust. They argue that marriage encompasses not only dignity but also a collection of essential rights.
FAQs
Q: What is same-sex marriage?
Same-sex marriage, also known as gay marriage or equal marriage, is the legal union between two individuals of the same gender. It grants them the same rights, benefits, and responsibilities as heterosexual couples in a recognized marital relationship.
Q: Why should same-sex marriage be legalized?
Legalizing same-sex marriage is a matter of equality and human rights. Denying individuals the right to marry based on their sexual orientation is discriminatory and goes against principles of fairness and justice. Legal recognition of same-sex unions ensures that all couples have equal access to legal protections, benefits, and responsibilities.
Q: How does legalizing same-sex marriage benefit society?
Legalizing same-sex marriage promotes societal acceptance and inclusion. It fosters a culture of respect for diversity and strengthens the institution of marriage by recognizing the love and commitment shared by all couples, regardless of gender. Moreover, it can have positive economic impacts by boosting wedding-related industries and increasing government revenue through marriage licenses and taxes.
Q: What are some arguments against legalizing same-sex marriage?
Opponents of same-sex marriage often cite religious or cultural beliefs, arguing that marriage should be reserved for heterosexual couples based on traditional definitions. However, it’s important to recognize that civil marriage is a legal institution regulated by the state, separate from religious ceremonies. Some also express concerns about potential impacts on children raised by same-sex couples, but research consistently shows that children thrive in loving and supportive family environments, regardless of their parents’ sexual orientation.
Q: What has been the global trend regarding the legalization of same-sex marriage?
Over the past few decades, there has been a significant global trend toward legalizing same-sex marriage. Many countries have recognized the rights of LGBTQ+ individuals to marry, either through legislative action or court rulings. This trend reflects evolving societal attitudes toward LGBTQ+ rights and equality. However, there are still regions where same-sex marriage remains illegal or controversial, highlighting the ongoing struggle for LGBTQ+ rights worldwide.
In case you still have your doubts, contact us on 9811333901.
For UPSC Prelims Resources, Click here
For Daily Updates and Study Material:
Join our Telegram Channel – Edukemy for IAS
- 1. Learn through Videos – here
- 2. Be Exam Ready by Practicing Daily MCQs – here
- 3. Daily Newsletter – Get all your Current Affairs Covered – here
- 4. Mains Answer Writing Practice – here
