A case study is a comprehensive and in-depth examination of a particular subject, often within its real-life context. It serves as a methodological tool to explore, analyze, and understand complex issues or phenomena, ranging from individual experiences to organizational challenges. Typically employed in various academic disciplines, business settings, and scientific research, a case study involves an extensive investigation that aims to provide a detailed account of the subject under scrutiny. By delving into the intricate details of a specific case, researchers can uncover valuable insights, draw conclusions, and offer practical solutions. This method offers a holistic approach, allowing for a nuanced understanding of the multifaceted factors influencing the subject, making it an invaluable tool for gaining knowledge and informing decision-making processes.
Q9. The Supreme Court has banned mining in the Aravalli Hills to stop degradation the forest cover and to maintain ecological balance. However, the stone mining to still prevalent in the border district of the affected State with connivance of certain corrupt forest officials and politicians. Young and dynamic SP who was recently posted in the affected district promised to himself to stop this menace. In one of his surprise checks with his team, he found loaded truck with stone trying to escape the mining area. He tried to stop the truck but the truck driver overrun the police officer, killing him on the spot and thereafter managed to flee. Police filed FIR but no breakthrough was achieved in the case for almost three months. Ashok who was the Investigative Journalist working with leading TV channel, suo moto started investigating the case. Within one month, Ashok got breakthrough by interacting with local people, stone mining masia and government officials. He prepared his investigative story and presented to the CMD of the TV channel. He exposed in his investigative report the complete nexus of stone mafia working with blessing of corrupt police and civil officials and politicians. The politician who was involved in the mafia was no one else but local MLA who was considered to be very close to the Chief Minister. After going through the investigative report, the CMD advised Ashok to drop the idea of making the story public through electronic media. He informed that the local MLA was not only the relative of the owner of the TV channel but also had unofficially 20 percent share in the channel. The CMD further informed Ashok that his further promotion and hike in pay will be taken care of in addition the soft loan of 10 lakhs which he has taken from the TV channel for his son’s chronic disease will be suitably adjusted if he hands over the investigative report to him.
(a) What are the options available with Ashok to cope up with the situation?
(b) Critically evaluate/examine each of the options identified by Ashok.
(c) What are the ethical dilemmas being faced by Ashok?
(d) Which of the options, do you think, would be the most appropriate for Ashok to adopt and why?
(e)In the above scenario, what type of training would you suggest for police officers posted to such districts where stone mining illegal activities are rampant? (Answer in 250 words) 20
Answer
(a) Ashok has a few options to consider:
- He can agree to the CMD’s demands and hand over the investigative report to him in exchange for the promised benefits.
- He can refuse the CMD’s demands and choose to go public with the investigative report through another media outlet or by publishing it online.
- He can approach higher authorities, such as the Editor-in-Chief or regulatory bodies, to intervene and ensure that the investigative report is aired without any compromise on journalistic ethics.
(b) Each of these options has its pros and cons. If Ashok chooses the first option, he will be compromising on his journalistic integrity by allowing his report to be suppressed in exchange for personal benefits. This could also damage his reputation as a journalist in the long run. If he chooses the second option, he could face legal or other repercussions for publishing the investigative report without the consent of his employer. However, going public could also bring the issue to the forefront and lead to action being taken against those involved in the illegal activities. If he chooses the third option, he may face backlash from his employer, but could also be protected by journalistic ethics and laws that ensure the freedom of the press. The success of this option would depend on the willingness of higher authorities to intervene and support Ashok.
(c) The ethical dilemmas being faced by Ashok include upholding his professional obligations and journalistic integrity while dealing with the corrupt system and navigating the power dynamics involved. He is also faced with a moral dilemma of weighing personal benefits against the public interest and the impact of his actions on the larger community.
(d) The most appropriate option for Ashok would be to approach higher authorities or regulatory bodies to intervene and ensure that his investigative report is aired without compromising on journalistic ethics. This would ensure that the public is informed about the illegal activities and the corruption involved, and action can be taken against those involved. Ashok should also document his interactions with the CMD and any threats or inducements made to him in case he needs to defend his actions in the future.
(e) Police officers posted to such districts should receive training on the legal and environmental implications of illegal mining activities, as well as the ethical dilemmas they may face while dealing with the powerful players involved. They should also receive training on conducting unbiased investigations, handling evidence, and ensuring the safety of themselves and their team members during operations. The training should be conducted by experts in the field and reinforced through regular refreshers and feedback mechanisms to ensure effectiveness. Additionally, officers should be incentivized and protected for reporting any misconduct or corruption within their own department or with other government officials. This would help create a culture of transparency and accountability and reduce the likelihood of corrupt practices being normalized or perpetuated.
In case you still have your doubts, contact us on 9811333901.
For UPSC Prelims Resources, Click here
For Daily Updates and Study Material:
Join our Telegram Channel – Edukemy for IAS
- 1. Learn through Videos – here
- 2. Be Exam Ready by Practicing Daily MCQs – here
- 3. Daily Newsletter – Get all your Current Affairs Covered – here
- 4. Mains Answer Writing Practice – here
