The UPSC (Union Public Service Commission) examination is renowned as one of the most prestigious and challenging competitive exams in India. In the year 2021, the General Studies Paper 4, often referred to as GS 4, presented candidates with a diverse array of ethical dilemmas and situational questions. This paper aimed to evaluate the ethical and moral aptitude of aspiring civil servants, testing their ability to navigate complex issues with integrity and sound judgment. Through a series of case studies and theoretical inquiries, candidates were required to demonstrate their understanding of ethical principles and their practical application in governance and public administration. The UPSC GS 4 paper serves as a crucial benchmark for selecting individuals who possess not only the knowledge but also the ethical fortitude necessary to serve the nation with honesty, fairness, and dedication.
Q:9 An elevated corridor is being constructed to reduce traffic congestion in the capital of a particular state. You have been selected as project manager of this prestigious project on your professional competence and experience. The deadline is to complete the project in the next two years by 20 June 2021, since this project is to be inaugurated by the Chief Minister before the elections are announced in the second week of July 2021. While carrying out the surprise inspection by the inspection team, a minor crack was noticed in one of the piers of the elevated corridor possibly due to poor material used. You immediately informed the chief engineer and stopped further work. It was assessed by you that a minimum of three piers of the elevated corridor have to be demolished and reconstructed. But this process will delay the project minimum by four to six months. But the chief engineer overruled the observation of the inspection team on the ground that it was a minor crack which will not in any way impact the strength and durability of the bridge. He ordered you to overlook the observation of the inspecting team and continue working with the same speed and tempo. He informed you that the minister does not want any delay as he wants the chief Minister to inaugurate the elevated corridor before the elections are declared. Also informed you that the contractor is a distant relative of the minister and he wants him to finish the project. He also gave you a hint that your further promotion as additional chief engineer is under consideration with the ministry. However, you strongly felt that the minor crack in the pier of the elevated corridor will adversely affect the health and life of the bridge and therefore it will be very dangerous not to repair the elevated corridor.
- Under the given conditions, what are the options available to you as a project manager?
- What are the ethical dilemmas being faced by the project manager?
- What are the professional challenges likely to be faced by the project manager and his response to overcome such challenges?
- What can be the consequences of overlooking the observation raised by the inspecting team? (250 words)
Answer:
Approach:
- Start with a brief introduction with the context of nepotism and favouritism in the public workplace.
- Mention the Stakeholders in the case.
- Mention the Options available to me as the project manager.
- Mention the Ethical dilemma faced by the project manager.
- Mention the Professional challenges likely to be faced by the project manager.
- How The project manager can overcome these challenges.
- Write The consequences of overlooking the observations of the inspecting team.
- Conclusion accordingly.
Introduction:
- Nepotism and favouritism in the public workplace are pervasive issues that have significant implications for organisational effectiveness, fairness, and public trust. These practices involve showing preferential treatment or granting undue advantages to individuals based on personal relationships or connections rather than merit and qualifications.This unethical behaviour erodes transparency, undermines morale, and hampers the overall efficiency and integrity of public institutions. Addressing and combating nepotism and favouritism is crucial for fostering a merit-based and inclusive work culture that upholds the principles of fairness, accountability, and equal opportunities.
Body:
The Stakeholders in case: The stakeholders in the case include:
- Myself as the project manager
- Chief engineer of the project
- Inspecting team (who noticed the minor crack)
- Minister (who wants the project completed before the elections)
- Chief Minister (who is going to inaugurate the elevated corridor)
- Contractor (who is a relative of the minister and wants to finish the project)
The Options available to me as the project manager: As the project manager, you have several options available to you in this situation:
- Option 1: Follow the chief engineer’s order and continue the work as advised.
- Merits: This option may lead to your promotion and satisfy the minister’s desire for the project to be completed before the elections.
- Demerits: It compromises the safety and quality of the project, potentially endangering the lives of the residents.
- Option 2: Raise the issue with the political leadership.
- Merits: By bringing the matter to the attention of higher authorities, you can highlight the potential risks and ensure that proper actions are taken to address the crack and maintain project quality.
- Demerits: This option may lead to political complications and could potentially put your own career prospects at risk.
- Option 3: Request a transfer from the project.
- Merits: If you believe that the project’s quality is compromised and continuing with it goes against your professional standards, requesting a transfer can help you avoid personal responsibility for any potential negative consequences.
- Demerits: Transferring from the project may not guarantee a solution to the underlying problem, and it may not address the safety concerns for the residents.
The Ethical dilemma faced by the project manager: The project manager in this scenario faces several ethical dilemmas:
- Balancing Own Benefit vs Public Benefit: Continuing with the project as advised by the chief engineer and prioritising personal promotion may conflict with the responsibility to ensure public safety. Choosing personal gain over the potential risks to the lives of residents raises ethical concerns.
- Right Method vs Right End: Proceeding with the project to meet the deadline and secure the Chief Minister’s inauguration, despite the compromised quality of the resources, raises an ethical dilemma. It involves sacrificing the right method of construction and compromising the long-term durability of the bridge for the sake of achieving the desired end.
- Administrative Ethics vs Work Efficiency: Completing the project on time may earn praise for work efficiency, but it compromises the project manager’s administrative ethics. Upholding professional standards and ensuring the use of quality materials and construction practices may conflict with the pressure to prioritise speed and timely completion.
- Political Pressure and Favouritism:The project manager is caught in a situation where political pressure and favouritism influence decision-making. The contractor’s relationship with the minister and the desire for the Chief Minister’s timely inauguration create conflicts of interest and compromise fair decision-making.
- Liability and Legal Consequences:The project manager faces the ethical dilemma of potential liability and legal consequences in case of a project failure. Overlooking the crack and proceeding with the project puts them at risk of being held accountable for any negative outcomes, such as a collapse or accidents.
The Professional challenges faced by the project manager: The project manager in this scenario is likely to face several professional challenges. Here are some of the challenges they may encounter:
- Upholding Quality and Safety Standards: The discovery of a crack indicates potential issues with the construction materials, and addressing this challenge may involve thorough investigations, reconstruction, and additional quality control measures.
- Navigating Political Interference: This challenge requires careful navigation to uphold professional standards and protect the public interest, while also managing relationships with political stakeholders.
- Time and Schedule Constraints: Balancing the need for timely completion with ensuring quality and addressing the crack will be a significant challenge. This may involve revising the project schedule, reallocating resources, and managing stakeholders’ expectations.
- Dealing with Contractor Relations: Balancing fair treatment, contractual obligations, and maintaining ethical standards in dealing with the contractor will be a challenge. The project manager may need to navigate potential conflicts of interest and ensure the contractor’s compliance with quality standards.
- Managing Internal and External Pressures: This challenge requires maintaining professional integrity, asserting expertise, and effectively communicating the potential risks and consequences associated with disregarding the crack’s significance
The project manager can overcome these challenges: The project manager can overcome the professional challenges they face through several strategies and actions:
- Maintain Professional Integrity: The project manager should prioritise professional ethics and integrity above personal gains or political pressures. They should commit to upholding quality standards, transparency, and accountability throughout the project.
- Effective Communication:The project manager should effectively communicate the importance of addressing the crack in the piers and the potential risks involved to all stakeholders. This includes presenting a detailed report on the findings, implications, and necessary actions.
- Seek Support from Higher Authorities: The project manager can approach higher authorities such as the Chief Engineer, concerned ministry, or even the Chief Minister to present the inspection team’s observations and emphasise the need for proper repairs. Seeking support from those with decision-making authority can help address the challenges and overcome any resistance faced.
- Conduct Further Investigations: This can involve engaging external experts, conducting additional tests, and analysing the structural integrity of the affected piers. Concrete evidence can strengthen the case for necessary repairs and justify the decision to prioritise safety over political expediency.
- Document Everything: This will provide a strong record of their commitment to professional standards and serve as evidence in case of any future inquiries or investigations.
- Collaborate with Experts: Engaging with experts in the field of civil engineering or structural integrity can provide valuable insights and guidance. Their expertise can help in assessing the severity of the crack, determining the necessary repairs, and ensuring compliance with safety standards.
- Advocate for Change: This may involve reporting the issue to higher authorities, conducting internal investigations, or seeking assistance from external oversight bodies. Advocating for change and promoting a culture of transparency and accountability can help address systemic issues.
- Maintain a Focus on Public Safety: The project manager should always prioritise public safety above all else. By emphasising the potential risks associated with an unchecked crack and advocating for proper repairs, they can ensure that the project aligns with professional standards and safeguards the well-being of the users.
The consequences of overlooking the observations of the inspecting team: The consequences of overlooking the observations raised by the inspecting team can have significant implications:
- Compromised Structural Integrity: The crack, if left unattended, may worsen over time, potentially leading to structural failure or collapse of the elevated corridor. This poses a severe risk to the lives and safety of the people using the corridor, as well as potential damage to surrounding infrastructure.
- Public Safety Concerns: If the elevated corridor suffers from structural deficiencies due to the unresolved crack, it puts the lives and well-being of the commuters and residents at risk. This can result in accidents, injuries, or even fatalities, leading to public outcry, legal consequences, and reputational damage for all stakeholders involved.
- Cost Overruns and Project Delays: If the crack worsens and requires emergency repairs or complete demolition and reconstruction of multiple piers, it can significantly impact the project’s budget and timeline. This can lead to financial losses, strained relationships with stakeholders, and a negative impact on the reputation of the project manager and the organisation responsible for the construction.
- Legal and Regulatory Issues: Authorities responsible for ensuring construction standards and safety regulations may initiate investigations and impose penalties or sanctions if it is discovered that the project manager knowingly overlooked the observations and jeopardised public safety. Legal battles, fines, and legal liabilities can arise, further damaging the project’s reputation and potentially affecting the professional career of the project manager.
- Damage to Professional Reputation: The project manager may be perceived as prioritising personal gains or political pressures over ethical responsibility and public safety. This can result in loss of trust and credibility among colleagues, superiors, and the public. It may also affect future career prospects and opportunities within the field of project management.
Conclusion:
- Hence, As Mahatma Gandhi once said, “The best way to find yourself is to lose yourself in the service of others.” overlooking the observations raised by the inspecting team in the case of the elevated corridor project can have severe consequences. The project manager faces ethical dilemmas and professional challenges in balancing personal interests, project deadlines, and public safety. However, it is essential to prioritise public safety and uphold professional integrity.
In case you still have your doubts, contact us on 9811333901.
For UPSC Prelims Resources, Click here
For Daily Updates and Study Material:
Join our Telegram Channel – Edukemy for IAS
- 1. Learn through Videos – here
- 2. Be Exam Ready by Practicing Daily MCQs – here
- 3. Daily Newsletter – Get all your Current Affairs Covered – here
- 4. Mains Answer Writing Practice – here
