Comparison of UN with the League of Nations – UPSC World History Notes

The United Nations (UN) and the League of Nations represent two distinct eras in the realm of international governance, each shaped by the geopolitical landscape of its time. The League of Nations, established in the aftermath of World War I in 1920, aimed to prevent future conflicts through collective security and diplomatic cooperation. However, it faced significant challenges, including the absence of major powers like the United States and the inability to effectively address aggressive actions by expansionist states. The League’s shortcomings became evident with the outbreak of World War II, leading to its dissolution in 1946. In contrast, the United Nations emerged in 1945 with an enhanced structure, inclusive membership, and a Security Council designed to address power imbalances. The UN has played a more robust role in international affairs, overseeing peacekeeping missions, promoting human rights, and facilitating global cooperation on issues like climate change and development. While both organizations share the common goal of fostering global peace and security, the United Nations, with its more flexible and inclusive structure, has demonstrated greater resilience and adaptability in addressing the challenges of the modern world.

Success Factors for the United Nations (UN):

1. Dedication to Economic and Social Development: The UN has devoted more time and resources to economic and social development work. It has established numerous specialized agencies focusing on various aspects of development, contributing to its effectiveness in these areas. Notably, the scope of the UN in the domain of socio-economic development is much broader than that of the LoN.
2. Emphasis on Good Governance: The UN places a strong emphasis on promoting good governance and has formulated and worked with member nations to achieve development targets, such as the Millennium Development Goals. This focus on governance and development has contributed to its success.
3. Revised Decision-Making Procedures: The UN has adapted its decision-making procedures to address issues of unanimous voting and veto powers. The ability to bypass unanimous decisions in the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) and overrule the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) veto through the Uniting for Peace Resolution has allowed for more decisive action.
4. Prestige of the UN Secretary-General: The UN Secretary-General holds a position of significant influence and prestige, which has enabled them to mediate conflicts and bring about ceasefires in various conflicts. Notable figures like Kofi Annan have been celebrated for their conflict resolution abilities.
5. Global Governance in an Integrated World: The UN’s importance has grown in the era of global governance, particularly as the world has become more integrated due to factors like liberalization, privatization, and globalization. The UN addresses issues of global concern, including environmental protection and the management of global commons.

In summary, the UN has benefited from its enhanced focus on economic and social development, good governance, and revised decision-making procedures. It has also adapted to the changing global landscape and has played a more significant role in addressing global challenges, making it more effective in its mission compared to the League of Nations.

Significant similarities between the United Nations (UN) and the League of Nations (LoN):

1. Common Aim: Both the UN and LoN shared a common goal of promoting world peace and socio-economic development. They were established to prevent conflicts and foster global prosperity.
2. Veto Powers: Both organizations had a system in place that granted certain member states, particularly major powers, the authority to veto decisions made by their respective security councils. This system was designed to provide a mechanism for major powers to protect their interests.
3. Lack of Permanent Army: Neither the UN nor the LoN had a standing, permanent army of their own. Instead, they relied on member states to contribute troops and resources when necessary to address conflicts or crises.

Common Weaknesses:

1. Tool of Superpowers: Both the UN and LoN faced criticism for being perceived as instruments of powerful nations, particularly the major powers involved in their formation. This criticism often stemmed from the perception that these organizations served the interests of the dominant global players.
2. Pro-West Bias: Both organizations were accused of exhibiting a pro-Western bias, which means they were seen as favoring Western nations in their policies and decision-making processes.
3. Subservience to Powerful Nations: Critics argued that both the UN and LoN were at times influenced or controlled by powerful individual nations. This influence could impact the effectiveness and impartiality of these organizations.
4. Financial Dependency on Certain Regions: Both the UN and LoN faced financial dependency on specific member states or regions. The UN, for example, has been heavily reliant on funding from the United States, while the LoN relied on contributions from Britain and France.

These commonalities and weaknesses highlight some of the challenges faced by international organizations in maintaining their impartiality, effectiveness, and independence in the face of geopolitical realities and power dynamics among member states.

The period from 1919 to 1923 witnessed significant developments and challenges in the aftermath of World War I. Here’s an overview of the key events and factors during this time:

1. Turkish Nationalism: The Treaty of Sèvres (1920) imposed harsh terms on the Ottoman Empire, leading to widespread Turkish nationalism. Mustafa Kemal Atatürk emerged as a prominent leader, and Turkish forces successfully repelled Greek occupation forces, resulting in the renegotiation of the treaty and the establishment of modern-day Turkey.
2. Italian Unhappiness: Italy was dissatisfied with the territorial gains it received after World War I. Benito Mussolini’s rise to power in 1922 led to Italy’s seizure of Fiume from Yugoslavia and the Corfu Incident in 1923, where Italy occupied the Greek island of Corfu following the killing of Italian workers. These actions reflected Italy’s discontent with the post-war settlement.
3. US War Debt: The United States had provided loans and sold arms to the Allied powers during the war. However, when it came to post-war negotiations and debt repayment, the U.S. insisted on full repayment of the war debt. This policy was a source of tension between the U.S. and its wartime allies.
4. German Reparations: The issue of war reparations was a contentious one. Germany was devastated by the war and sought leniency in terms of the reparations it had to pay. Britain was more inclined to ease the terms, as a prosperous Germany would benefit its exports. France, on the other hand, pushed for strict reparations, partly to keep Germany economically weak and partly because it relied on German reparations to repay loans from the U.S.

Russian Civil War: The aftermath of the Russian Revolution and the Bolshevik seizure of power led to the Russian Civil War (1918-1920). The Bolsheviks, under Lenin, established a communist regime in Russia and sought to export the revolution to other countries. This caused tensions with Western nations and Japan, which sent forces to intervene in the Russian Civil War, supporting the anti-Bolshevik White forces. The civil war ended with Bolshevik victory, consolidating communist rule in Russia.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. FAQ: How does the United Nations differ from the League of Nations?

Answer: The United Nations (UN) and the League of Nations were both international organizations aimed at promoting peace and cooperation, but they differed significantly in structure and effectiveness. The League of Nations, established after World War I in 1920, lacked the participation of major powers like the United States, limiting its effectiveness. In contrast, the UN, founded in 1945 after World War II, included major powers from its inception, making it more representative and influential on the global stage.

2. FAQ: What role did the United States play in the League of Nations and the United Nations?

Answer: The United States played a crucial role in the establishment of both the League of Nations and the United Nations, but with different outcomes. While President Woodrow Wilson championed the League of Nations after World War I, the U.S. Senate rejected membership, leading to the League’s eventual ineffectiveness. In contrast, the United States played a pivotal role in the creation of the UN, and it has been a permanent member of the Security Council since its inception, contributing to the UN’s more central and influential role in global affairs.

3. FAQ: How did the League of Nations and the United Nations address conflicts and maintain peace?

Answer: The League of Nations primarily relied on diplomatic measures and economic sanctions to address conflicts, lacking a standing military force. This contributed to its limited ability to enforce decisions and prevent the outbreak of World War II. In contrast, the United Nations has a standing peacekeeping force and a more robust Security Council, allowing for more effective responses to conflicts. The UN’s ability to deploy peacekeeping missions has played a significant role in preventing and resolving conflicts in various regions.

4. FAQ: Were there any improvements in the structure of the United Nations compared to the League of Nations?

Answer: Yes, the United Nations incorporated several improvements in its structure compared to the League of Nations. One key enhancement was the establishment of the Security Council with the power to enforce decisions, including the use of military force if necessary. The inclusion of major powers as permanent members with veto power aimed to prevent the shortcomings of the League, where major powers were absent or had limited involvement.

5. FAQ: How successful has the United Nations been compared to the League of Nations in achieving its goals?

Answer: The United Nations has been more successful than the League of Nations in achieving its goals, particularly in maintaining international peace and security. The UN’s peacekeeping missions, humanitarian efforts, and diplomatic initiatives have contributed to conflict resolution and the prevention of large-scale wars. The League of Nations, on the other hand, failed to prevent the outbreak of World War II and ultimately dissolved in 1946. The UN’s enduring presence and adaptability highlight its greater success in fulfilling its mission.

In case you still have your doubts, contact us on 9811333901. 

For UPSC Prelims Resources, Click here

For Daily Updates and Study Material:

Join our Telegram Channel – Edukemy for IAS

• 1. Learn through Videos – here
• 2. Be Exam Ready by Practicing Daily MCQs – here
• 3. Daily Newsletter – Get all your Current Affairs Covered – here
• 4. Mains Answer Writing Practice – here

Visit our YouTube Channel – here