In dissecting state budgets, a critical question emerges: do growth projections align with actual economic realities? This editorial analysis scrutinizes the efficacy of growth forecasts within state budgets, probing whether they accurately anticipate economic shifts. As states navigate complex fiscal landscapes, the ability of projections to keep pace with dynamic realities becomes paramount. By delving into this discrepancy, we can better understand the challenges states face in maintaining fiscal stability amidst fluctuating economic conditions.
Tag: GS-3 Economics, GS-2 Fiscal Federalism
In News: A recent article discusses different facets of state budgets and underscores the significant variations between actual grants disbursed by the Centre to states and the estimates provided by the states themselves, particularly concerning Centrally Sponsored Schemes.
Understanding the Fiscal Position of Indian State Governments
Concerns Regarding State Finances
- Reliance on Own Revenues
- About half of the total revenues of states come from their own tax revenues (SOTR), making any deviation from projected growth rates impactful.
- The growth of key components of own taxes, such as sales tax and state GST, has been below expectations, impacting revenue projections.
- Devolution from the Centre
- Transfers from the Centre account for 40-45% of state revenues, with tax devolution projected to increase but showing variability.
- States have seen fluctuations in actual grants received compared to estimates, particularly in Centrally Sponsored Schemes (CSS).
- Debt Issuance
- Actual debt issuance has exceeded projections, possibly due to factors like holding larger cash reserves during the Model Code of Conduct period.
- Gross borrowing is expected to rise significantly, potentially impacting fiscal health.
- Capital Spending
- Capital spending is anticipated to start slowly due to elections and may remain subdued during the monsoon months, leading to back-ended spending.
- Technical Inefficiencies in Tax Collection
- High technical inefficiencies exist in collecting state taxes, affecting revenue generation and leading to tax evasion.
- Lack of Uniformity in Tax Structures
- Lack of uniformity in GST slabs and motor vehicle tax structures across states creates complexity and challenges in revenue collection.
- Vertical Fiscal Imbalance
- Vertical fiscal imbalance exists between the Union and state governments, with states having major expenditure responsibilities but limited tax powers.
- Concerns Regarding Cess and Surcharge
- Revenue collected from cess and surcharge is exclusively at the disposal of the Union government, posing challenges for state finances.
Suggestions for Improving State Finances
- Balance Between Tax and Non-Tax Revenues
- States should aim to increase their own tax and non-tax revenue ratios sustainably while aligning financial resources with state priorities.
- Prioritizing Private Investments in Less Developed States
- Less developed states should receive focused attention to attract private investments and aid their growth potential.
- Implementing Recommendations of Finance Commissions
- States should adopt recommendations from finance commissions for restructuring government finances, taxation reforms, subsidy rationalization, and fiscal transfers.
- Rationalizing Revenue Deficits
- States should avoid borrowing for revenue expenditures and focus on increasing revenue streams to cover essential expenditures.
- Harnessing Royalty Rates on Minerals
- States should advocate for regular revisions of royalty rates on minerals to maximize revenue from this source.
Conclusion
Improving state finances requires comprehensive strategies including enhanced revenue mobilization, prudent fiscal management, and efficient resource utilization. By prioritizing economic growth, reducing unnecessary expenditures, and implementing recommended reforms, states can strengthen their financial positions and better serve their citizens.
| UPSC Previous Year Questions Prelims (2018) Q. Consider the following statements: 1. The Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management (FRBM) Review Committee Report has recommended a debt to GDP ratio of 60% for the general (combined) government by 2023, comprising 40% for the Central Government and 20% for the State Governments. 2. The Central Government has domestic liabilities of 21% of GDP as compared to that of 49% of GDP of the State Governments. 3. As per the Constitution of India, it is mandatory for a State to take the Central Government’s consent for raising any loan if the former owes any outstanding liabilities to the latter. Which of the statements given above is/are correct? (a) 1 only (b) 2 and 3 only (c) 1 and 3 only (d) 1, 2 and 3 Ans: C Mains (2019)Q.1 Public expenditure management is a challenge to the Government of India in the context of budget-making during the post-liberalization period. Clarify it. Mains (2014)Q.2 Normally countries shift from agriculture to industry and then later to services, but India shifted directly from agriculture to services. What are the reasons for the huge growth of services vis-a-vis the industry in the country? Can India become a developed country without a strong industrial base? |
Source: IE
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
1. How do state budgets incorporate growth projections?
State budgets typically rely on economic forecasts to anticipate revenue streams, which directly influence expenditure allocations. Growth projections encompass factors like GDP growth, employment rates, and consumer spending, serving as vital metrics for budget planning.
2. What challenges arise when aligning growth projections with reality?
Numerous factors can disrupt the accuracy of growth projections, including unforeseen economic shocks, changes in federal policies, and shifts in global markets. Additionally, inaccuracies in data collection or modeling techniques can lead to discrepancies between projected and actual growth.
3. Why is it crucial for growth projections to keep pace with reality in state budgets?
Accurate growth projections are essential for effective budgeting and policymaking. If projections fall short of reality, states may face budget deficits, necessitating cuts to essential services or tax hikes. Conversely, overly optimistic projections can lead to overspending and financial instability.
4. How do states mitigate the risk of inaccurate growth projections?
States employ various strategies to enhance the accuracy of growth projections, such as utilizing multiple economic models, consulting with experts, and regularly revising forecasts based on new data. Additionally, maintaining fiscal reserves provides a buffer against unexpected revenue shortfalls.
5. What measures can be taken to improve the alignment between growth projections and reality?
Enhancing transparency in the budgeting process, improving data collection methodologies, and fostering collaboration between economists and policymakers can help bridge the gap between projections and reality. Continuous monitoring and evaluation of economic trends also enable states to adjust their budgets accordingly.
In case you still have your doubts, contact us on 9811333901.
For UPSC Prelims Resources, Click here
For Daily Updates and Study Material:
Join our Telegram Channel – Edukemy for IAS
- 1. Learn through Videos – here
- 2. Be Exam Ready by Practicing Daily MCQs – here
- 3. Daily Newsletter – Get all your Current Affairs Covered – here
- 4. Mains Answer Writing Practice – here
