The Satyam scandal of 2009 sent shockwaves through the global business community, revealing a web of corporate deceit that shattered investor confidence and highlighted severe lapses in corporate governance. Satyam Computer Services, once considered a pillar of India’s IT industry, became embroiled in a massive financial fraud orchestrated by its founder, Ramalinga Raju. In the aftermath of this scandal, regulators and policymakers recognized the urgent need for reforms to restore trust in corporate structures. Consequently, a series of significant changes were introduced in corporate governance to enhance transparency and accountability. The Companies Act of 2013 in India, for instance, underwent substantial amendments to strengthen board independence, audit oversight, and financial disclosure requirements. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) also played a pivotal role by issuing revised guidelines and codes of conduct for listed companies, emphasizing the separation of roles between the chairman and CEO, augmenting the role of independent directors, and implementing stringent norms for financial reporting. These reforms aimed not only at punitive measures but also at fostering a culture of ethical business practices, to prevent such egregious corporate misconduct in the future. The Satyam scandal thus catalyzed a paradigm shift in the corporate governance landscape, pushing for comprehensive reforms that prioritize transparency, accountability, and ethical conduct.
Tag: Important aspects of governance, transparency and accountability, e-governance.
Decoding the Question:
- In the Introduction, try to start with the Definition of corporate governance and a brief introduction about the Satyam Scandal (2009).
- In Body, discuss about:
- The background of Satyam Scandal (2009).
- Mention the Changes Brought in Corporate Governance to Ensure Transparency and Accountability.
- Further Developments Brought in Corporate Governance to Ensure Transparency and Accountability.
- In Conclusion, mention the success of Kotak Committee recommendations.
Answer:
Corporate governance is the system by which companies are directed and controlled. Boards of directors are responsible for the governance of their companies. The shareholders’ role in governance is to appoint the directors and the auditors and to satisfy themselves that an appropriate governance structure is in place.
Background of Satyam Scandal (2009):
- Satyam Scandal in 2009 was about corporate governance and fraudulent auditing practices allegedly in connivance with auditors and chartered accountants.
- The company misrepresented its accounts both to its board, stock exchanges, regulators, investors, and all other stakeholders.
- It misled the market and other stakeholders by lying about the company’s financial health. Even basic facts such as revenues, operating profits, interest liabilities and cash balances were grossly inflated to show the company in good health.
- The Chairman of Satyam Software Services Ltd, Ramalinga Raju, confessed to a Rs 7,136 crore fraud committed by him and a few others at the company.
The Changes Brought in Corporate Governance to Ensure Transparency, Accountability: The scam highlighted several loopholes in the Indian corporate governance structure – unethical conduct, fraudulent accounting, insider trading, oversight by auditors, ineffectiveness of the Board, failure of independent directors and non-disclosure of material facts to the stakeholders.
- In 2009, the Confederation of Indian Industries set up a task force headed by former cabinet secretary Naresh Chandra to suggest reforms.
- Based on the recommendations of this task force, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs issued Voluntary Guidelines for Corporate Governance in 2009.
- In April 2014, SEBI amended the Listing Agreement to include provisions relating to the establishment of a vigil mechanism, the role of the Audit Committee in cases of suspected fraud or irregularity, and the role of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer in financial reporting and disclosure to the Audit Committee.
- In 2015, SEBI framed the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 (“LODR”), applicable to all listed companies, and provided for stringent guidelines relating to reporting/disclosure of material events and actual and suspected fraud.
- Companies Act, 2013: The new Act made a clear departure from the old Act and brought in several measures intended to benefit the larger stakeholder community, with the resulting increase in compliance costs for the company. The Act provides for corporate fraud as a criminal offense. It sets out clear obligations for reporting instances of fraud on auditors, cost accountants, and company secretaries. It clearly outlines the responsibility and accountability of auditors and independent directors, who are expected to play a more active role. An amendment to the Companies Act, 2013 in April 2014 made India the first country in the world to make corporate social responsibility (CSR) mandatory.
- The SEBI Committee on Corporate Governance was formed on June 02, 2017, under the Chairmanship of Mr. Uday Kotak along with different stakeholders from the Government, industry, stock exchanges, academicians, lawyers etc. The Committee aimed to improve the standards of corporate governance of listed companies in India.
- Disclosure of utilization of funds from QIP/preferential issue: Companies will have to ensure better transparency and appropriate disclosures about the utilization of proceeds of preferential issues and QIPs till the time such proceeds are utilized.
- Disclosures of auditor credentials, audit fees, and reasons for the resignation of auditors: Companies will have to give disclosures about the credentials and terms of appointment of the auditors. The move will ensure more transparency and help investors make informed decisions.
- Disclosure of expertise/skills of directors: The board of directors of every listed entity should be required to list the competencies and expertise that it believes its directors should possess.
- Enhanced disclosure of related party transactions (RPTs): Companies will have to make half-yearly disclosure of RPTs on a consolidated basis. Strict penalties on those failing to do so.
In the years since the Satyam scam broke out, substantial changes have been made concerning corporate governance in India. The use of criminal sanctions by the Parliament to regulate corporate conduct has been on the rise. The regulators and the investigative bodies are more vigilant. The increased compliance costs of companies only serve well to protect the interests of all the stakeholders in the company.
In case you still have your doubts, contact us on 9811333901.
For UPSC Prelims Resources, Click here
For Daily Updates and Study Material:
Join our Telegram Channel – Edukemy for IAS
- 1. Learn through Videos – here
- 2. Be Exam Ready by Practicing Daily MCQs – here
- 3. Daily Newsletter – Get all your Current Affairs Covered – here
- 4. Mains Answer Writing Practice – here
