Lawrence Kohlberg’s Approach
The stages of moral development were proposed by Lawrence Kohlberg, a psychologist who conducted research on the development of moral reasoning. Kohlberg’s theory proposes that individuals progress through six stages of moral development, which can be grouped into three levels:
- Pre-conventional level: This level of moral development is focused on self-interest and personal gain. The two stages within this level are:
- Stage 1: Obedience and punishment orientation – individuals at this stage are motivated by avoiding punishment and obeying authority figures.
- Stage 2: Instrumental purpose and exchange – individuals at this stage are motivated by self-interest and may make decisions based on what they can gain for themselves.
- Conventional level: This level of moral development is focused on societal norms and expectations. The two stages within this level are:
- Stage 3: Interpersonal relationships and conformity – individuals at this stage are motivated by a desire to be accepted by others and to maintain social norms and expectations.
- Stage 4: Social order and maintaining the system – individuals at this stage are motivated by a desire to maintain social order and adhere to laws and regulations.
- Post-conventional level: This level of moral development is focused on universal ethical principles and values. The two stages within this level are:
- Stage 5: Social contract and individual rights – individuals at this stage are motivated by a belief in social contracts and the importance of individual rights and freedoms.
- Stage 6: Universal principles and ethics – individuals at this stage are motivated by a commitment to universal ethical principles, such as justice, equality, and human dignity.
It is important to note that not all individuals progress through all stages of moral development, and individuals may progress through the stages at different rates or may become stuck at a certain stage. Additionally, cultural and societal factors may influence an individual’s moral development. Nonetheless, Kohlberg’s theory of moral development provides a framework for understanding how individuals develop moral reasoning and ethical decision-making capabilities.
Jean Piaget’s Approach
Jean Piaget, a Swiss psychologist, proposed a theory of moral development that suggests that children go through two stages of moral reasoning. Piaget’s theory focuses on how children develop their own sense of morality and make moral judgments. The two stages of moral development in Piaget’s theory are:
- Heteronomous morality: In this stage, which occurs from ages 4 to 7, children believe that rules are fixed and unchangeable. Children at this stage see rules as coming from authority figures such as parents, teachers, and God. They believe that breaking a rule will inevitably result in punishment, regardless of the intentions behind the action.
- Autonomous morality: In this stage, which occurs from ages 10 to 12, children develop a more sophisticated understanding of rules and their underlying principles. Children at this stage begin to recognize that rules can be changed through negotiation and agreement among individuals. They begin to understand that rules are not absolute and that there may be valid reasons for breaking a rule in certain situations.
According to Piaget, children progress through these stages of moral development as they grow and develop cognitively. As children become more capable of abstract thinking and logical reasoning, they are better able to understand the principles behind rules and to make moral judgments based on these principles. Piaget’s theory of moral development has been influential in understanding how children develop their own sense of morality and in guiding the development of moral education programs. However, it has also been criticized for being too focused on individual reasoning and not taking into account the influence of cultural and societal factors on moral development.
Carol Gilligan’s Approach
Carol Gilligan, an American psychologist, proposed a theory of moral development that focused on the differences between males and females in their moral reasoning. Gilligan’s theory challenged the idea that the male perspective represented the universal standard for moral development, as proposed by earlier theorists like Kohlberg and Piaget. Gilligan’s theory of moral development suggests that women tend to use a different type of moral reasoning than men.
Gilligan proposed three stages of moral development in her theory:
- The pre-conventional stage: This stage is similar to the pre-conventional stage in Kohlberg’s theory. In this stage, individuals are focused on their own needs and desires and may make moral judgments based on whether an action will bring pleasure or pain.
- The conventional stage: In this stage, individuals begin to focus on the needs of others and on social expectations. Individuals at this stage make moral judgments based on whether an action will be seen as right or wrong by others.
- The post-conventional stage: In this stage, individuals focus on principles such as justice, compassion, and equality. Individuals at this stage may challenge social norms and expectations and may make moral judgments based on their own sense of what is right.
Gilligan’s theory of moral development differs from Kohlberg’s theory in that it focuses on the different ways that males and females tend to approach moral reasoning. According to Gilligan, females tend to use an “ethic of care,” which emphasizes relationships, empathy, and responsibility to others. Males, on the other hand, tend to use an “ethic of justice,” which emphasizes principles such as fairness and individual rights.
Gilligan’s theory of moral development has been influential in highlighting the importance of gender differences in moral reasoning and in advocating for a more inclusive approach to moral education. However, it has also been criticized for oversimplifying the complex ways in which individuals develop their own moral reasoning and for reinforcing gender stereotypes.
Differences in the approaches
| Theory | Focus | Stages of Moral Development | Gender Differences |
| Piaget | Cognitive development | Heteronomous morality: rules are fixed and unchangeable; Autonomous morality: rules can be changed through negotiation and agreement among individuals | No explicit focus on gender differences |
| Kohlberg | Moral reasoning | Preconvention morality: focus on self-interest; Conventional morality: focus on social norms and expectations; Postconventional morality: focus on abstract principles of justice and fairness | No explicit focus on gender differences |
| Gilligan | Gender and moral reasoning | Preconvention stage: self-interest and obedience; Conventional stage: focus on social relationships and expectations; Postconventional stage: balance between self and others | Emphasis on differences between males and females, with females more likely to use an “ethic of care” focused on empathy and responsibility to others, and males more likely to use an “ethic of justice” focused on principles of fairness and individual rights |
FAQs on Moral Development
1.What is moral development, and why is it important for UPSC aspirants?
Moral development refers to the process through which individuals acquire and internalize ethical values, principles, and decision-making skills. It is vital for UPSC aspirants as it helps them make ethical choices, act with integrity, and handle ethical dilemmas effectively during their civil service careers.
2. What are the key stages of moral development, and how do they impact ethical decision-making?
Moral development, as theorized by psychologists like Lawrence Kohlberg, typically progresses through stages, from pre-conventional to conventional and post-conventional levels. The stage an individual is at can influence their ethical reasoning and choices, with higher stages reflecting more sophisticated moral thinking.
3. How can UPSC aspirants actively promote their moral development during their exam preparation?
Aspirants can promote their moral development by engaging in ethical discussions, analyzing case studies, practicing ethical decision-making, and seeking feedback from mentors. Reflecting on personal values and ethical principles also contributes to moral growth.
4. What role does moral development play in the UPSC Ethics paper and the Interview stage?
Moral development is assessed in the UPSC Ethics paper and the Interview stage to evaluate candidates’ ethical reasoning and decision-making abilities. It’s essential to demonstrate a mature and nuanced understanding of ethics, drawing from one’s moral development.
5. Can moral development be fostered or accelerated, and if so, how?
Moral development is a gradual process influenced by experiences, education, and introspection. While it cannot be rushed, individuals can actively engage in ethical discussions, study ethical philosophy, and practice ethical decision-making to enhance their moral development.
In case you still have your doubts, contact us on 9811333901.
For UPSC Prelims Resources, Click here
For Daily Updates and Study Material:
Join our Telegram Channel – Edukemy for IAS
- 1. Learn through Videos – here
- 2. Be Exam Ready by Practicing Daily MCQs – here
- 3. Daily Newsletter – Get all your Current Affairs Covered – here
- 4. Mains Answer Writing Practice – here
