- Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES), also referred to as payments for environmental benefits, are incentives provided to farmers or landowners.
- In return, they undertake land management practices that contribute to specific ecological services.
- These initiatives are transparent systems designed to encourage voluntary providers by offering conditional payments.
- The primary objective of such programs is to foster the conservation of natural resources within the marketplace.
ECOSYSTEM SERVICE PAYMENT:
- The Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) model serves as an effective strategy for conserving and enhancing ecosystem services.
- It operates through the establishment of performance contracts, where individuals contributing to the desired ecosystem service are rewarded based on their actions or the quality and quantity of services provided.
- PES offers a distinctive opportunity to incentivize local land stewards in managing endangered ecosystems.
- This approach holds the potential to simultaneously address conservation objectives and alleviate poverty, aligning with the broader goals of Sustainable Development.
- Positioned as a pivotal economic instrument for conservation, PES joins a range of incentives for biodiversity protection and sustainable use, including taxes, fees, levies, tradeable permits, and PES itself.
- Governments can influence both public and private financing flows for biodiversity through these economic instruments.
- While mobilizing biodiversity finance through mechanisms like pesticide levies and admission fees to natural parks has garnered governmental support, PES has faced challenges in attracting attention and support in the Indian subcontinent.
In contrast, Latin American and African countries have seen successful implementations of PES. Examples include the Cape Nature Stewardship Programme in the Western Cape, South Africa, safeguarding biodiversity on private lands, and Kenya’s Wildlife Conservation Lease Programme in Kitengela, maintaining open areas for wildlife and grazing on private grounds.
CHALLENGES:
- For a Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) program to thrive, it must navigate several obstacles in its implementation.
- These limitations encompass the need for a robust institutional framework that facilitates the seamless transfer of funds from buyers to suppliers.
- Monitoring processes necessitate investments in local capacity building to ensure effectiveness.
- Cost efficiency is a critical consideration, along with exploring the potential for developmental benefits.
- Sustaining funds over time poses another challenge.
- A pivotal element in overcoming these limitations is the establishment of a local monitoring mechanism, integral to the successful execution of a PES program.
WAY AHEAD
The OECD’s report on “Biodiversity: Finance and the Economic and Business Case for Action” in 2019 emphasized the critical need to assess the performance of financial instruments in achieving biodiversity objectives.
Notably, recent OECD research points out the limited number of comprehensive impact evaluation studies for terrestrial and marine biodiversity. The OECD recommends conducting thorough impact evaluations and establishing strategic criteria to identify policies or initiatives requiring closer scrutiny.
Moreover, a robust policy approach, exemplified by initiatives like the TEEB India Initiative highlighting the economic implications of biological diversity loss, is crucial for prioritizing financing for ecosystem restoration.
A global endeavor, such as the United Nations Environment Programme Finance Initiative, dedicated to mobilizing private sector finance for the benefit of both people and the environment, can play a pivotal role in sustaining funds for these critical initiatives.
FAQs – Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) and Conservation
1. What are Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES)?
A: Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) are incentives provided to farmers or landowners who engage in specific land management practices contributing to ecological services. These are transparent systems designed to encourage voluntary providers through conditional payments.
2. How does the PES model work in conserving ecosystems?
A: The PES model operates through the establishment of performance contracts. Individuals contributing to desired ecosystem services are rewarded based on their actions or the quality and quantity of services provided. It serves as a unique opportunity to incentivize local land stewards for managing endangered ecosystems.
3. What are the broader objectives of PES programs?
A: The primary objective of PES programs is to foster the conservation of natural resources within the marketplace. This includes addressing conservation goals, alleviating poverty, and aligning with Sustainable Development objectives.
4. What incentives are included in PES and similar economic instruments for biodiversity?
A: PES is positioned among a range of incentives for biodiversity protection and sustainable use, including taxes, fees, levies, tradeable permits, and PES itself. Governments utilize these instruments to influence both public and private financing flows for biodiversity.
5. How successful has PES been globally, and are there any specific examples?
A: While PES has seen successful implementations in Latin American and African countries, it has faced challenges in garnering attention and support in the Indian subcontinent. Examples of successful PES programs include the CapeNature Stewardship Programme in South Africa and Kenya’s Wildlife Conservation Lease Programme in Kitengela.
In case you still have your doubts, contact us on 9811333901.
For UPSC Prelims Resources, Click here
For Daily Updates and Study Material:
Join our Telegram Channel – Edukemy for IAS
- 1. Learn through Videos – here
- 2. Be Exam Ready by Practicing Daily MCQs – here
- 3. Daily Newsletter – Get all your Current Affairs Covered – here
- 4. Mains Answer Writing Practice – here
