The Right to Privacy Judgement, delivered by the Supreme Court of India on August 24, 2017, marked a watershed moment in Indian jurisprudence. In this landmark ruling, the Court affirmed that the right to privacy is a fundamental right guaranteed under the Indian Constitution. The judgment, which stemmed from a series of petitions challenging the government’s Aadhaar biometric identification program, addressed the intersection of individual liberties and state interests in an increasingly digital and interconnected world. By recognizing privacy as an inherent aspect of human dignity, the Court’s decision set a significant precedent, reshaping the legal landscape and igniting debates on data protection, surveillance, and the balance of power between the state and its citizens.
Puttaswamy Case: Upholding the Right to Privacy
In the landmark case of Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v Union of India, the right to privacy emerged as a fundamental human right, echoing the sentiments expressed in Article 12 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. This right, safeguarding individuals from arbitrary interference in their privacy, gained significance in the context of Aadhar Cards issuance.
Contextual Background: The petitioner, Retired Justice Puttaswamy, challenged the constitutionality of Aadhar, asserting that it violated the fundamental right to privacy recognized by the Constitution and emphasized in previous Supreme Court judgments. Notably, M.P. Sharma v Satish Chandra, Maneka Gandhi v Union of India, Kharak Singh v State of UP, and Peoples Union for Civil Liberties v Union of India laid the foundation for addressing privacy concerns.
Key Issues Before the Court:
- The Court deliberated on whether the Right to Privacy qualifies as a fundamental right, despite not being explicitly provided for in the Constitution.
- It aimed to clarify the constitutional position regarding the right to privacy, given the previous judgments had not expressly declared it an absolute fundamental right.
Judgment Highlights: The Supreme Court, through a 9-judge bench, issued a comprehensive judgment on August 24, 2017, affirming the fundamental right to privacy embedded in Article 21. Key points from the judgment include:
- Privacy concerns can arise from both state and non-state entities.
- Informational privacy, particularly in the age of the internet, is not absolute; controlling one’s data may impact privacy to a certain extent.
- The scope of Article 21 continually expands, encompassing numerous rights over the years.
- The right to privacy is an integral part of Part III of the Constitution, guaranteeing fundamental rights.
Triple Test for Privacy Incursion: The Court established a three-pronged test for any incursion into privacy by state or non-state actors:
- Legitimate Aim
- Proportionality
- Legality
Overruling Previous Decisions: The judgment overruled the decisions in M.P. Sharma v Satish Chandra and Kharak Singh, affirming that the Right to Privacy is constitutionally protected under Article 21 and is an intrinsic component of Part III.
Significance of the Puttaswamy Judgment:
1. Fundamental Right Recognition: The Puttaswamy case marked a historic moment by officially recognizing the right to privacy as a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. This ensures that individuals can seek legal recourse against state overreach by approaching the Supreme Court or high court.
2. Strengthening Freedoms: The judgment reinforces freedom of thought, expression, and belief. It acts as a safeguard against unwarranted interference by the state in private matters, encompassing areas such as marriage, family, and personal relationships.
3. Protection Against Surveillance: It provides a crucial shield against potential state surveillance, ensuring that citizens’ private lives remain safeguarded from unnecessary intrusion.
4. Inclusivity for Transgender and LGBT Rights: The Puttaswamy verdict contributes to the advancement of rights for the transgender and LGBT communities, exemplified by the repeal of Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code. This promotes dignity and equality for all individuals.
5. Safeguarding Dignity and Integrity: The judgment upholds the dignity and integrity of an individual’s body, mind, and thoughts, establishing a protective framework for the private sphere.
6. Accountability and Justice: Individuals now have the means to hold the state accountable for any encroachment into their private zones or unwarranted surveillance without consent, ensuring justice prevails.
7. Encouraging Debates and Awareness: The verdict fosters debates and encourages awareness about the rights enjoyed by citizens, stimulating a broader understanding of privacy in the digital age.
8. Scrutiny of Privacy Policies: The judgment challenges the validity of privacy policies adopted by various entities, including companies, pushing for greater transparency and accountability in data processing practices.
Government Measures to Protect Right to Privacy:
1. Mandatory Individual Consent: Data sharing should mandate individual consent, applicable to all entities, including the State. Consent should be a prerequisite for obtaining and processing data, specifying the purpose and means.
2. Establishment of Data Protection Authority (DPA): An independent regulatory body, such as a Data Protection Authority (DPA), must be established to enforce and implement data protection laws effectively.
3. Diligent Monitoring and Enforcement: The government should diligently and transparently monitor and enforce various regulations and laws related to data protection, ensuring compliance.
4. Promoting Research and Awareness: Promote research and awareness programs to educate citizens about their right to privacy, emphasizing the importance of protecting sensitive personal data.
5. Prohibition of Unconsented Use of Sensitive Data: Sensitive personal data, including biometrics, should be prohibited for use without explicit written consent from the individuals concerned.
6. Appellate Tribunal for Privacy Breaches: The Central Government should establish an appellate tribunal dedicated to hearing and disposing of appeals against privacy breaches.
7. Imposing Penalties: Penalties for violations of data protection laws should be imposed, with fines serving as a deterrent. Compensation for the loss of privacy should be facilitated through these fines, ensuring accountability.
FAQs
Q: What is the Right to Privacy Judgement?
The Right to Privacy Judgement refers to a landmark ruling by the Supreme Court or a relevant legal authority that recognizes privacy as a fundamental right protected by law.
Q: What does the Right to Privacy Judgement entail?
The Right to Privacy Judgement typically affirms that individuals have the right to control their personal information, make autonomous decisions about their private lives, and be free from unwarranted intrusion or surveillance by the government or other entities.
Q: How does the Right to Privacy Judgement impact citizens?
This judgement provides citizens with legal recourse against privacy infringements, such as unauthorized data collection, surveillance, or dissemination of personal information without consent. It empowers individuals to safeguard their privacy rights and holds authorities accountable for respecting these rights.
Q: Does the Right to Privacy Judgement apply to digital activities?
Yes, the Right to Privacy Judgement often extends to digital activities, recognizing the importance of protecting personal data in the digital age. It may influence legislation and rulings related to data privacy, surveillance, and cybersecurity.
Q: What are the implications of the Right to Privacy Judgement on government policies?
The Right to Privacy Judgement may necessitate the revision of existing laws and policies to align with constitutional principles of privacy protection. Governments may need to implement safeguards to ensure that citizens’ privacy rights are respected in areas such as surveillance, data collection, and information sharing.
In case you still have your doubts, contact us on 9811333901.
For UPSC Prelims Resources, Click here
For Daily Updates and Study Material:
Join our Telegram Channel – Edukemy for IAS
- 1. Learn through Videos – here
- 2. Be Exam Ready by Practicing Daily MCQs – here
- 3. Daily Newsletter – Get all your Current Affairs Covered – here
- 4. Mains Answer Writing Practice – here
