The emergence of Swarajists, socialistic ideas, revolutionary activities, and other new forces played a significant role in shaping the nationalist movement in India during the early 20th century:
- Swarajists and No-Changers:
- The Swarajists, led by figures like C.R. Das, Motilal Nehru, and Ajmal Khan, advocated for entering legislative councils to expose their weaknesses and use them as a platform for political struggle.
- On the other hand, the No-Changers, led by C. Rajagopalachari, Vallabhbhai Patel, Rajendra Prasad, and M.A. Ansari, opposed council entry and focused on constructive work, boycotting, and quiet preparation for civil disobedience.
- Congress-Khilafat Swarajya Party:
- The differences between the Swarajists and No-Changers led to the formation of the Congress-Khilafat Swarajya Party, also known as the Swarajist Party.
- This party aimed to combine the demand for Swaraj (self-rule) with support for the Khilafat Movement, which sought to protect the Ottoman Caliphate, seen as a symbol of Muslim solidarity.
- Socialist Ideas:
- Socialist ideas began to gain traction within the nationalist movement, influenced by global socialist movements and the Russian Revolution.
- Leaders like Jawaharlal Nehru, Subhas Chandra Bose, and Bhagat Singh espoused socialist principles and advocated for economic equality and social justice.
- Revolutionary Activities:
- Revolutionary groups like the Hindustan Socialist Republican Association (HSRA) and the Ghadar Party advocated for armed struggle against British rule.
- Figures like Bhagat Singh, Chandrashekhar Azad, and Ram Prasad Bismil became symbols of revolutionary resistance and inspired nationalist sentiments.
- Other New Forces:
- Alongside the mainstream Congress movement and revolutionary activities, other new forces emerged, such as the Arya Samaj, which promoted Hindu nationalism, and the Muslim League, which sought to protect Muslim interests.
- These diverse movements and ideologies contributed to the complexity and dynamism of the nationalist movement, reflecting the diverse social, religious, and political landscape of India at the time.
Overall, the emergence of these new forces marked a period of ideological diversity and experimentation within the nationalist movement, laying the groundwork for the broader struggle for independence from British colonial rule.
The arguments put forth by the Swarajists and the No-Changers regarding the entry into legislative councils reflected differing perspectives on the most effective strategy for advancing the nationalist movement:
Swarajists’ Arguments:
- Continuation of Movement: Swarajists believed that entering the councils would not contradict the non-cooperation program but rather complement it by opening a new front for the movement.
- Mass Enthusiasm: They argued that council work would help maintain the morale of the masses during a period of political vacuum and prevent the government from filling the councils with unsympathetic elements.
- Political Struggle: Swarajists saw the councils as an arena for political struggle, with no intention of using them to gradually transform colonial rule.
No-Changers’ Arguments:
- Focus on Constructive Work: No-Changers feared that parliamentary work would divert attention from constructive activities, undermine revolutionary fervor, and potentially lead to political corruption.
- Preparation for Civil Disobedience: They believed that constructive work would better prepare the populace for the next phase of civil disobedience, emphasizing the importance of maintaining the revolutionary spirit.
Compromise and Unity: Despite their differences, both factions recognized the need for unity within the nationalist movement. They avoided a split akin to the one in 1907 and remained in contact with Gandhi, who was in jail at the time. To maintain unity, a compromise was reached in September 1923, allowing the Swarajists to contest elections within the Congress while accepting the party’s overall program. The Swarajists agreed to join legislative councils, and elections were held accordingly in November 1923.
The emergence of new forces in Indian politics during the third decade of the twentieth century brought about significant changes and diversification in the nationalist movement:
- Socialistic Ideas: The period saw the rise of socialist ideologies within the nationalist movement, influenced by international socialist thought. Indian political thinkers began advocating for socialism as a means to address socio-economic inequalities and uplift the marginalized sections of society.
- Youth Power: The youth played a crucial role during this period, bringing dynamism and energy to the nationalist movement. Many young leaders emerged who were deeply committed to the cause of independence and social reform. They injected fresh ideas and enthusiasm into the struggle against British colonial rule.
- Trade Unionism: The growth of industrialization and urbanization led to the formation of trade unions, representing the interests of workers in various industries. Trade unionism became an integral part of the broader nationalist movement, as workers fought for better working conditions, fair wages, and labor rights. Trade unions also became platforms for political activism and mobilization against colonial exploitation.
Overall, the third decade of the twentieth century witnessed the consolidation of various political currents within the nationalist movement, ranging from Gandhian satyagraha to socialist ideologies and youth activism. These diverse forces contributed to the shaping of modern Indian politics and laid the foundation for the country’s struggle for independence.
The 1920s marked the emergence of Marxist and socialist ideas within the Indian nationalist movement, leading to the formation of new political groups and the rise of a left-wing faction within the Indian National Congress. Here are some key points regarding this development:
- Influence of Marxist and Socialist Ideas: The ideas of Karl Marx and other socialist thinkers inspired the formation of various socialist and communist groups in India. Young nationalists, including Jawaharlal Nehru and Subhash Chandra Bose, were influenced by these ideologies and advocated radical solutions to address the country’s economic, political, and social challenges.
- Critique of Gandhian Approach: The younger nationalists were critical of both the Swarajists and the No-Changers within the Congress. They believed that a more consistent anti-imperialist stance was needed, advocating for complete independence (purna swarajya) rather than incremental reforms.
- Formation of Communist Party of India (CPI): The Communist Party of India (CPI) was founded in 1920 in Tashkent, following the second Congress of the Communist International (Commintern). Leaders like M.N. Roy played a prominent role in its establishment. The CPI aimed to organize workers and peasants and propagate Marxist ideas.
- Kanpur Bolshevik Conspiracy Case: In 1924, several communists, including S.A. Dange, Muzaffar Ahmed, and Shaukat Usmani, were arrested in the Kanpur Bolshevik Conspiracy Case. This event highlighted the government’s crackdown on communist activities.
- Meerut Conspiracy Case: In 1929, the Meerut Conspiracy Case involved the arrest and trial of 31 communist leaders, trade unionists, and left-wing activists. This further demonstrated the government’s efforts to suppress communist activities.
- Workers’ and Peasants’ Parties: Workers’ and peasants’ parties were organized across the country to promote Marxist and communist ideas. These groups aligned themselves with the broader nationalist movement and collaborated with the Indian National Congress.
Overall, the 1920s witnessed the growing influence of Marxist and socialist ideologies within the Indian nationalist movement, leading to the formation of the CPI and the emergence of a left-wing faction advocating for radical change. These developments added new dimensions to the struggle for independence and social justice in India.
During the 1920s, Indian youth became increasingly active in various spheres of society, contributing to political, social, and economic movements. Here are some key areas of their activism during this period:
- Student Activism: Students’ leagues were established across India, and students’ conferences became platforms for expressing political views. In 1928, Jawaharlal Nehru presided over the All Bengal Students’ Conference, highlighting the involvement of young leaders in political discourse.
- Peasants’ Agitations: Peasant movements were prevalent, particularly in the United Provinces, Andhra Pradesh, Rajasthan, and regions of Bombay and Madras. These movements focused on issues such as revising tenancy laws, reducing rents, preventing evictions, and addressing indebtedness. Notable examples include the Bardoli Satyagraha led by Vallabhbhai Patel in Gujarat in 1928.
- Trade Unionism: The trade union movement gained momentum with the establishment of the All India Trade Union Congress (AITUC) in 1920. Led by figures like Lala Lajpat Rai and Dewan Chaman Lal, AITUC organized strikes in various industries, including railways, steel, textiles, and mills. The first May Day celebration in India took place in Madras in 1923.
- Caste Movements: Various caste-based movements emerged, reflecting the diverse social landscape of India. These movements ranged from conservative to potentially radical and included initiatives like the Justice Party in Madras, the Self-respect movement led by E.V. Ramaswamy Naicker, and efforts by leaders like Bhaskar Rao Jadhav, Ambedkar, and others to address caste-based inequalities.
- Revolutionary Activities: Some dissatisfied individuals turned to revolutionary activities, particularly those disillusioned with the nonviolent nationalist approach. Groups like the Hindustan Republican Association (H.R.A.) in Punjab, Uttar Pradesh, and Bihar, as well as the Yugantar and Anushilan groups in Bengal, advocated for revolutionary change, with some leaning towards socialist ideologies.
Overall, the 1920s witnessed a surge in youth activism across India, with young people engaging in various movements aimed at addressing social, economic, and political injustices and advocating for change.
During the period of revolutionary activity with a turn towards socialism, two main strands emerged among dissatisfied individuals who rejected the nonviolent nationalist strategy:
- Hindustan Republican Association (H.R.A.): Operating in Punjab, Uttar Pradesh, and Bihar, the H.R.A. was a revolutionary organization that aimed to overthrow British rule through armed struggle. Founded by revolutionaries such as Ram Prasad Bismil, Chandrashekhar Azad, and Bhagat Singh, the H.R.A. advocated for a socialist society free from colonial oppression. It carried out various revolutionary activities, including the Kakori conspiracy of 1925, which aimed to loot British government funds to finance the revolutionary movement.
- Yugantar and Anushilan Groups, Chittagong Revolt Group: In Bengal, revolutionary movements such as Yugantar and Anushilan groups emerged, advocating for armed resistance against British rule. Led by revolutionary figures like Aurobindo Ghosh, Barin Ghosh, and Rash Behari Bose, these groups promoted socialist ideas and organized attacks on symbols of British authority. One of the notable actions was the Chittagong Armoury Raid in 1930 led by Surya Sen, where revolutionaries attempted to seize arms from a British armory to initiate an uprising.
These revolutionary organizations and groups played a significant role in challenging British colonial rule and promoting socialist ideologies. They sought to mobilize the masses for armed struggle and social revolution, diverging from the nonviolent methods advocated by mainstream nationalist leaders like Mahatma Gandhi.
The attraction towards revolutionary activity after the Non-Cooperation Movement can be attributed to several factors:
- Disillusionment with Non-Cooperation Movement: Many revolutionaries initially supported or suspended their activities to give the non-violent Non-Cooperation Movement a chance under the leadership of Mahatma Gandhi and C.R. Das. However, when the movement was abruptly withdrawn, leaving many disillusioned, they began to question the effectiveness of non-violent methods in achieving independence.
- Questioning Nationalist Leadership: The sudden withdrawal of the Non-Cooperation Movement led to questioning of the basic strategy of nationalist leadership, which emphasized non-violence. Some younger nationalists felt that violent methods might be necessary to achieve India’s freedom, as they were not attracted to the parliamentary or constructive work advocated by other nationalist factions.
- Release of Revolutionaries: Many revolutionaries who had faced severe repression during World War I were released by the government under a general amnesty in early 1920 to create a harmonious environment for the Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms. Their release provided a new impetus to revolutionary activities.
- Influence of Revolutionary Leaders: Major leaders of revolutionary movements, such as Jogesh Chandra Chatterjee, Surya Sen, Bhagat Singh, and Chandrasekhar Azad, had been enthusiastic participants in the Non-Cooperation Movement. Their involvement and subsequent disillusionment played a significant role in reviving revolutionary activities.
Overall, the combination of disillusionment with non-violent methods, the release of revolutionaries, and the influence of revolutionary leaders contributed to the resurgence of revolutionary activity during the 1920s in India.
These were the major influences that contributed to the resurgence of revolutionary activity during the 1920s:
- Upsurge of Working Class Trade Unionism: The post-war period saw a significant increase in working-class trade unionism, which provided fertile ground for revolutionary ideas. Revolutionaries sought to harness the revolutionary potential of the emerging working class for the nationalist revolution.
- Russian Revolution (1917): The success of the Russian Revolution and the establishment of the young Soviet state had a profound impact on Indian revolutionaries. It demonstrated the possibility of overthrowing imperialist powers and establishing a socialist society, inspiring revolutionary movements around the world.
- Emergence of Communist Groups: The emergence of communist groups with their emphasis on Marxism, socialism, and the rights of the proletariat provided ideological guidance and organizational structure to revolutionary activities in India.
- Propaganda through Journals: Journals such as Atmasakti, Sarathi, and Bijoli played a crucial role in propagating revolutionary ideas and extolling the self-sacrifice of revolutionaries. They served as platforms for disseminating revolutionary literature and fostering a sense of camaraderie among revolutionaries.
- Literature: Novels and books like Bandi Jiwan by Sachin Sanyal and Pather Dabi by Sharatchandra Chatterjee contributed to the intellectual ferment of the time. These works depicted the struggles and sacrifices of revolutionaries, inspiring many to join the cause. The government ban on certain works only enhanced their popularity, fueling curiosity and dissent.
Overall, these influences converged to create an environment conducive to revolutionary activity, shaping the course of India’s struggle for independence during the 1920s.
FAQs
Q: What are some core principles of Socialistic Ideas?
A: Socialistic ideas advocate for collective ownership of resources and means of production, aiming for a more equitable distribution of wealth and resources among society. They prioritize social welfare, aiming to reduce income inequality and provide essential services like healthcare, education, and housing to all citizens.
Q: How can Youth Power contribute to societal change?
A: Youth power is a catalyst for societal change through activism, advocacy, and innovation. Young people often bring fresh perspectives, energy, and a sense of urgency to addressing pressing issues such as climate change, social justice, and political reform. By mobilizing and organizing, youth can influence policy decisions, challenge existing systems, and drive positive transformation.
Q: What is the role of Trade Unionism in today’s economy?
A: Trade unionism plays a crucial role in advocating for the rights and interests of workers in today’s economy. Trade unions negotiate with employers on behalf of workers to secure better wages, benefits, and working conditions. They also provide a collective voice for workers in addressing workplace grievances, promoting workplace safety, and fighting against exploitation and unfair labor practices.
Q: How do Socialistic Ideas address income inequality?
A: Socialistic ideas aim to address income inequality by redistributing wealth and resources more equitably among members of society. This may involve progressive taxation, where the wealthy are taxed at higher rates to fund social programs that benefit lower-income individuals and families. Additionally, socialistic principles often prioritize investments in education, healthcare, and social services to provide equal opportunities for all citizens regardless of their socioeconomic status.
Q: What are some challenges faced by Trade Unionism in the modern era?
A: In the modern era, trade unionism faces challenges such as globalization, automation, and declining membership rates. Globalization has led to increased competition and outsourcing, making it difficult for unions to maintain bargaining power. Automation has resulted in job displacement and shifts in labor markets, requiring unions to adapt and advocate for workers in emerging industries. Additionally, anti-union policies, changing attitudes towards collective bargaining, and the gig economy pose challenges to traditional union structures and strategies.
In case you still have your doubts, contact us on 9811333901.
For UPSC Prelims Resources, Click here
For Daily Updates and Study Material:
Join our Telegram Channel – Edukemy for IAS
- 1. Learn through Videos – here
- 2. Be Exam Ready by Practicing Daily MCQs – here
- 3. Daily Newsletter – Get all your Current Affairs Covered – here
- 4. Mains Answer Writing Practice – here
