State Peoples’ Movement – Modern History Notes

The State Peoples’ Movement represents a pivotal chapter in modern history, embodying the collective aspirations and struggles of diverse populations within a specific region. Emerging as a response to various socio-political and economic challenges, these movements have played a crucial role in shaping the destiny of states and nations. Characterized by the active participation of ordinary citizens, these movements often transcend traditional boundaries of class, caste, and ethnicity, fostering a sense of shared identity and purpose. Whether advocating for political autonomy, economic justice, or cultural recognition, State Peoples’ Movements are dynamic expressions of the people’s will, illustrating their determination to assert their rights and reshape the trajectory of their societies. This intricate tapestry of activism and civic engagement unfolds against the backdrop of a rapidly changing world, where individuals and communities strive to carve out spaces for themselves within the complex landscape of modern governance.

The growth of popular movements in the native princely states of India during the British colonial era was a response to both the suppression by the British government and the oppressive rule of the princely states themselves. While the British considered the princely states as supportive of their colonial interests, these states often imposed their own authoritarian rule on the people.
The native princely states were created to serve the British colonial administration and maintain their control over large parts of India. However, the people living in these states faced exploitation, limited rights, and a lack of representation in governance. The oppressive practices of the princely states, combined with the overall colonial rule, led to widespread discontent among the people.
As a result, popular movements emerged in the native princely states, driven by the desire for freedom, self-governance, and social justice. These movements aimed to challenge the autocratic rule of the princely states and resist the oppressive policies of the British government.
The state peoples’ movements in the native princely states played a significant role in advocating for political rights, social reforms, and economic justice. They mobilized the masses, organized protests, and demanded democratic representation and autonomy. These movements were often met with repression and resistance from both the British and the ruling authorities of the princely states.
The state peoples’ movements were part of the broader struggle for independence in India, and they contributed to the eventual dismantling of the princely states and the integration of their territories into the independent Indian nation.
It is important to note that the experiences and dynamics of these movements varied across different princely states, as they had diverse socio-cultural and political contexts. However, they collectively represented the aspirations of the people in the native princely states to assert their rights and freedom from colonial and oppressive rule.

Table of Contents

The causes for the state peoples’ movement in the native princely states can be attributed to several factors:

Distress among different sections of society: The peasants and artisans in the native princely states faced dire conditions, worse than their counterparts in British India. The stagnation in the domestic economy and the impact of British deindustrialization led to widespread suffering among these sections of society.
Middle-class leadership: The middle class played a significant role in spearheading the mass movements in the native princely states. They championed the causes of peasants and workers, advocating for their rights and fighting against the oppressive rule of the native princes.
Modernization and education: The spread of modernization and Western education in the native princely states resulted in the emergence of a newly educated intelligentsia. These individuals became aware of the social and political issues prevailing in society and took a leading role in organizing and leading popular movements.
Influence of the Indian National Congress: The formation of the Indian National Congress in 1885 had a profound impact on the state peoples’ movements. The All India character of the Congress, along with its popular programs like the Swadeshi and Vande Mataram movements, inspired and influenced the people of the princely states. The Congress provided a platform for their hopes and aspirations, and they looked to it for guidance and inspiration.
British exploitation and high-handedness: The actions of the British government, in collaboration with the native princes, resulted in the exploitation and suppression of the people in the native princely states. The British government’s interference in the administration of these states and the creation of the Chamber of Indian Princes in 1911 to express solidarity between the British and the native princes further fueled the people’s movements.
Overall, the distress among various sections of society, the influence of modernization and education, the role of the Indian National Congress, and British exploitation and high-handedness contributed to the state peoples’ movements in the native princely states, as the people sought to challenge the oppressive rule and fight for their rights and freedom.

The freedom struggle in the princely states faced several challenges and obstacles. Here are some key points highlighting the rise of the freedom struggle in the princely states:

Unrestricted Autocracies: The princely states were often governed as unrestricted autocracies, with rulers holding absolute power. The concentration of power limited the rights and freedoms of the people within these states.
High Land Tax Burden: The land tax burden in princely states was typically higher compared to British India. This placed a heavy economic burden on the people, contributing to their discontent and desire for reform.
Lack of Rule of Law and Civil Liberties: Princely states had fewer established systems of rule of law and civil liberties compared to British India. This absence of legal frameworks and protection further suppressed the aspirations of the people.
Misuse of State Funds: Rulers had unrestricted access to state funds, which often led to personal extravagance and wasteful spending. This misuse of funds deprived the states of resources that could have been used for the development and welfare of the people.
Limited Reforms: While some rulers attempted to introduce reforms in administration, taxation, and governance, the majority of princely states remained economically, socially, politically, and educationally backward. Reforms were often hindered due to various factors, including interference from British residents and suspicions of any support for nationalism.
British Interference: The British government played a significant role in shaping the situation in the princely states. As the national movement gained momentum, the British viewed potential support for nationalism among the rulers with suspicion. Constant surveillance and interference from British residents limited the initiative and potential for reform among the rulers.
Exceptions and Reforms: Despite the challenges, there were notable exceptions among the princely states. Some states, such as Baroda and Mysore, were able to promote industrial and agricultural development, administrative and political reforms, and education. These states demonstrated the potential for progress and served as inspirations for the freedom struggle in other princely states.
In summary, the freedom struggle in the princely states faced numerous hurdles, including autocratic rule, economic burdens, limited civil liberties, misuse of funds, British interference, and lack of reforms. However, certain states managed to break free from these limitations and achieve significant progress in various aspects, setting examples for others to follow.

The origin of the state peoples’ movement can be traced back to the agrarian and civil rebellions that occurred in India in the late 19th century. These rebellions, although brutally suppressed by the British and the native princes, marked a turning point and laid the foundation for the formation of democratic organizations and associations.

One significant step in this direction was the establishment of the Praja Parishad in Baroda in 1917. It was the first political organization of its kind that focused on addressing political, social, and economic issues in the princely states. The example set by Baroda inspired the formation of similar organizations in other princely states, leading to the emergence of local communities and movements.
The appointment of H. Butler, an official tasked with promoting better relations between the native princes and the British, aimed to curb the rising tide of democracy and popular institutions. However, the recommendations put forth by the committee were opposed by the people in the princely states, indicating their growing dissatisfaction with the prevailing conditions.
The formation of the All India States People’s Conference (AISPC) in 1927, initiated by Balwant Rai Mehta, Manmaya Lal Kotari, and G.R. Abhyankar in Kathiawar, further strengthened the state peoples’ movement. The conference aimed to fight for issues such as distinguishing between the private and public finances of the princes, establishing local self-government with elected representatives, separating the judiciary from the executive, and opposing arbitrary taxation on the people. The AISPC advocated for the overall development of princely states and civil liberties.
However, it is important to note that the AISPC had a dual character. While it stood against feudalism and fought for the rights of the people within the princely states, it did not adopt a completely anti-colonial stance. The movement within the princely states did not fully embrace anti-colonialism until the outbreak of the Quit India Movement.
Overall, the origin of the state peoples’ movement can be traced back to the agrarian and civil rebellions, the formation of organizations like Praja Parishad, and the establishment of the All India States People’s Conference. These developments paved the way for the mobilization of the people in the princely states and their struggle for democratic rights and social justice.

During the freedom struggle, the participation of people in the princely states was significant. Here are some key points highlighting their involvement:

Influence of Non-Cooperation and Khilafat Movement: The Non-Cooperation and Khilafat Movement, which started in 1920, had a profound impact on the princely states. It inspired the formation of numerous local organizations and movements within the states.
Formation of Praja Mandals and State People’s Conferences: In several princely states such as Mysore, Hyderabad, Baroda, Kathiawad States, Deccan States, Jamnagar, Indore, and Nawanagar, Praja mandals or State People’s Conferences were established. These organizations served as platforms for political workers and activists to raise their voices and demand reforms.
All India States’ People’s Conference (AISPC): The AISPC, founded in December 1927, played a crucial role in bringing together political workers from across the country who were involved in the freedom struggle within the princely states. Baiwantrai Mehta, Manikial Kothari, and G.R. Abhayankar were key figures in this initiative.
Congress Policy towards Princely States: The Indian National Congress formulated its policy toward the princely states during its session in Nagpur in 1920. The Congress called upon the princes to grant full responsible government in their states. However, it was made clear that political activities in the states should be conducted by individuals or local political organizations, rather than in the name of Congress.
Constraints and Emphasis on State-Building: Due to differences in political conditions, limited civil liberties, and the independent status of the princely states, there were certain restraints on political activities. The emphasis was on the people within the states building their strength and demonstrating their determination to fight for their demands.
Despite the challenges and variations among the princely states, the participation of people in these states played a significant role in the freedom struggle. Through their local organizations, conferences, and collective actions, they voiced their demands for reforms and worked towards the larger goal of independence from colonial rule.

The Indian National Congress (INC) played a significant role in the freedom struggle in the princely states. Here are some key points highlighting the role of the INC:

Informal ties with state people’s organizations: The Congress maintained strong informal ties with various organizations representing the people of the states, including the All India States’ People’s Conference (AISPC). These ties helped in coordination and collaboration between Congress and the state people’s movements.
Congress resolutions: The Congress reaffirmed its resolution in 1920, 1927, and 1929, emphasizing that the future of the states should be determined by the people of those states. Jawaharlal Nehru, in his presidential address at the Lahore Congress, emphasized the importance of the states being integrated with the rest of India.
Demand for fundamental rights: The Congress demanded that the princes guarantee the fundamental rights of the people in the states. This demand gained momentum with the proposals of the Government of India Act of 1935, which aimed to bring the Indian states into a constitutional relationship with British India.
Congress Ministries and Political Activity: The assumption of office by Congress Ministries in British India’s provinces in 1937 instilled a sense of confidence and expectation among the people of the princely states. The Congress being in power gave impetus to political activity in the states, and the Princes had to deal with the new political reality of the Congress’s influence.
New Awakening and Congress policy shift: The years 1938-1939 witnessed a new awakening in the Indian states, with movements demanding responsible government and other reforms. Praja manuals sprouted in many states, and major clashes occurred in several states. The Congress, recognizing the changing dynamics, altered its policy to support the state people’s movements.
Integration of Princely India and British India: The All India States’ People’s Conference elected Jawaharlal Nehru as its President for the Ludhiana session in 1939, symbolically bringing the movements in Princely India and British India together. The outbreak of World War II further intensified the struggle, and Congress extended the call for the struggle to the people of the states, demanding independence and the integration of the states into the Indian nation.
Overall, the Indian National Congress played a crucial role in mobilizing and supporting the state people’s movements, advocating for responsible government, and striving for the integration of the princely states into the larger struggle for Indian independence.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q: What is a State Peoples Movement?

A: A State Peoples Movement refers to a collective and organized effort by the citizens of a particular state or region to address socio-political issues or advocate for specific rights and reforms. These movements often arise in response to perceived injustices, economic disparities, or political grievances. The participants in these movements typically seek to bring about positive change and improvements in their state’s governance and society through non-violent means.

Q: Can you provide an example of a significant State Peoples Movement in modern history?

A: One notable example is the Chipko Movement that originated in the Indian state of Uttarakhand (formerly part of the state of Uttar Pradesh) in the 1970s. The Chipko Movement was a forest conservation movement where local communities, primarily consisting of villagers, hugged or “embraced” trees to prevent them from being felled by loggers. The movement aimed to protest against deforestation, protect the environment, and assert the rights of local communities over their natural resources.

Q: What are some common goals of State Peoples Movements?

A: State people movements often share common goals such as promoting social justice, ensuring human rights, combating corruption, and advocating for inclusive governance. These movements frequently seek to empower marginalized communities, address economic disparities, and promote sustainable development. Additionally, participants in State Peoples Movements may aim to foster democratic values, enhance civic participation, and create a more accountable and responsive government within their respective states or regions.

In case you still have your doubts, contact us on 9811333901.

For UPSC Prelims Resources, Click here

For Daily Updates and Study Material:

Join our Telegram Channel – Edukemy for IAS

1. Learn through Videos – here
2. Be Exam Ready by Practicing Daily MCQs – here
3. Daily Newsletter – Get all your Current Affairs Covered – here
4. Mains Answer Writing Practice – here