The demand for Special Category Status by various states in India has been a hot topic of debate. This status is meant to provide additional financial assistance and benefits to states that face unique challenges, like difficult geography or low development. While some states argue that they need this status to boost their economies and improve living conditions, others believe that the criteria for granting this status are outdated and unfair. Critics also suggest that instead of seeking special status, states should focus on better governance and efficient use of resources. The issue is complex and requires careful reconsideration to ensure fair and balanced development across the country.
Tags: GS-2, Polity & Governance- Federalism- Centre-State Relations- Special Category Status
Context:
- Special Category Status (SCS) has historically addressed regional disparities in India’s development landscape, but its relevance is debated in today’s changing political and economic environment.
- States aspiring for SCS often push for it without fully evaluating the net benefits and implications.
The Concept of SCS:
- Origins and Recommendations:
- SCS was first recommended by the Fifth Finance Commission in 1969 to address regional disparities in development. It was not originally provided for in the Indian Constitution.
- Initial Classification:
- Initially, SCS was granted to states like Jammu and Kashmir, Assam, and Nagaland in 1969. These states were identified as needing special assistance due to their unique challenges.
- Administration and Support:
- Historically, SCS for plan assistance was managed by the National Development Council under the erstwhile Planning Commission. This support included preferential treatment in funding allocations for developmental projects.
- Current Status:
- As of now, eleven states enjoy the Special Category Status. These states are: Assam, Nagaland, Himachal Pradesh, Manipur, Meghalaya, Sikkim, Tripura, Arunachal Pradesh, Mizoram, Uttarakhand, and Telangana.
- Inclusion of Telangana:
- Telangana, being the newest state formed in 2014 after its bifurcation from Andhra Pradesh, was also accorded SCS to aid its initial developmental challenges.
- Funding Model:
- SCS states historically received 90% of centrally-sponsored schemes as grants and 10% as loans, compared to 60-75% grants for other states.
- This model aimed to alleviate financial burdens, allowing SCS states greater flexibility in funding development projects tailored to their needs.
- Parameters (Based on Gadgil Formula):
- Hilly Terrain;
- Low Population Density and/or Sizeable Share of Tribal Population;
- Strategic Location along Borders with Neighbouring Countries;
- Economic and Infrastructure Backwardness; and
- Nonviable Nature of State finances.
Additional Benefits of Special Category Status:
- Concession in Taxes:
- Excise Duties: SCS states receive significant relief in excise duties, reducing the tax burden on local industries and promoting industrial development.
- Customs Duties: Concessions in customs duties lower the cost of imported raw materials, making it more economical for businesses to operate and expand in SCS states.
- Attractiveness for Investment: Lower tax rates enhance the attractiveness of SCS states for both individuals and businesses, encouraging investment and the establishment of new enterprises.
- Higher Central Plan Status:
- Financial Assistance: SCS states receive 90% of centrally sponsored scheme funds as grants, significantly reducing their financial burden compared to other states.
- Flexibility in Fund Utilisation: This funding structure provides flexibility to SCS states in utilising funds for various developmental projects tailored to their specific needs and challenges.
- Enhanced Financial Transfers
- Tax Devolution: The Finance Commission ensures a higher share of central taxes is transferred to SCS states, compensating for their developmental lag and geographical disadvantages.
- Support for Budgetary Deficits: SCS states benefit from favourable consideration of their budgetary deficits, receiving additional financial support to maintain essential public services and infrastructure projects.
Transition from Planning Commission to NITI Aayog;
- Mechanism Change: With the replacement of the Planning Commission by NITI Aayog, the central plan assistance mechanism shifted to the Finance Commission. Specific schemes remain managed directly.
- Objective Continuity: Despite structural changes, the core objective of supporting underprivileged states remains intact.
- Streamlined Allocation: The transition introduced a more streamlined and accountable process for fund allocation, emphasising performance-based incentives and outcomes.
Impact on Special Category Status (SCS) States:
- Continued Benefits: SCS states continue to benefit from financial support and tax concessions, crucial for their development.
- Development Trajectories: These benefits play a significant role in shaping the development trajectories of SCS states, ensuring sustained support for their unique challenges.
Recommendations of the 14th and 15th Finance Commissions
- 14th Finance Commission
- Acknowledgment: While not explicitly addressing SCS, the 14th FC acknowledged demands by proposing higher allocations for northeastern states, Uttarakhand, and Himachal Pradesh.
- Special Grants: Special grants were sanctioned to address specific challenges faced by these states, maintaining a focus on regional disparities.
- 15th Finance Commission
- Omission of SCS: The 15th FC did not mention SCS explicitly but allocated 10.5% of devolved taxes to northeastern and hilly states, which account for only 5.2% of the population.
- Population Data Change: Shift from using 1971 Census to 2011 Census data increased shares for SCS states (except Himachal Pradesh) due to higher population growth.
Challenges and Future Considerations for Special Category Status (SCS):
- Political Controversies and Bargaining
- Political Tool: SCS has increasingly become a tool for political bargaining, driven by regional parties influencing central policies.
- Impact on Assessment: Politicisation complicates the objective assessment of genuine developmental needs in states, focusing more on political gains.
- Fiscal Implications
- Budgetary Constraints: The central government faces challenges in balancing support for SCS states with other fiscal responsibilities.
- Equity Concerns: Allocation of substantial funds to SCS states may be perceived as unfair by other states, leading to regional tensions and calls for re-evaluation of benefits.
- Administrative Challenges
- Effective Utilisation: Ensuring effective use of allocated funds and benefits by SCS states is critical for developmental impacts.
- Transparency and Accountability: Robust frameworks are needed for transparent fund allocation, regular audits, and assessments to ensure benefits reach intended recipients.
- Establishing Clear, Updated Criteria
- Inclusive Framework: Criteria for SCS should consider economic performance, social development indices, and ecological vulnerabilities.
- Regular Review: A mechanism for periodic review and updating of criteria is essential to address evolving challenges and ensure relevance.
- Strengthening Institutional Mechanisms
- Transparency and Monitoring: Strengthening institutional mechanisms for transparency, accountability, and monitoring of fund utilisation.
- Capacity Building: Building state government capacities to efficiently manage and implement projects under SCS, maximising developmental impacts.
Conclusion:
The future of Special Category Status in India hinges on addressing current challenges through updated and transparent frameworks. By mitigating politicisation, ensuring equitable fiscal management, and enhancing administrative capabilities, SCS can continue to promote balanced regional development.
The focus must remain on fostering equitable growth, maintaining transparency, and ensuring accountability to achieve socio-economic transformation in underprivileged states.
Source: IE
FAQs
Q: What is Special Category Status for states?
- Answer: Special Category Status (SCS) is a classification given to certain states in India that face unique challenges like difficult terrain, low population density, and economic backwardness. States with SCS receive financial aid and other benefits from the central government to help address these challenges.
Q: Why do some states demand Special Category Status?
- Answer: States demand Special Category Status to receive more financial assistance from the central government. This extra funding can help them develop infrastructure, improve social services, and boost their overall economic growth.
Q: Why should states reconsider their demand for Special Category Status?
- Answer: States should reconsider their demand because the criteria for SCS are outdated and may not reflect current realities. Additionally, focusing on SCS might distract from other effective ways of addressing development challenges, such as implementing better policies and improving governance.
Q: What are the alternatives to Special Category Status for states?
- Answer: Alternatives include seeking more targeted financial assistance based on specific needs, improving state-level governance and administration, and fostering economic reforms to attract investment and stimulate growth. States can also work on better utilizing existing resources and schemes.
Q: How can states ensure development without Special Category Status?
- Answer: States can ensure development by focusing on good governance, creating a favorable environment for businesses, investing in education and healthcare, and effectively utilizing central government schemes. Collaboration with private sectors and adopting innovative policies can also drive growth and development.
To get free counseling/support on UPSC preparation from expert mentors please call 9773890604
- Join our Main Telegram Channel and access PYQs, Current Affairs and UPSC Guidance for free – Edukemy for IAS
- Learn Economy for free- Economy for UPSC
- Mains Answer Writing Practice-Mains Answer Writing
- For UPSC Prelims Resources, Click here