The recent events surrounding the state’s seizure of India’s press have ignited concerns about the erosion of journalistic freedom and the broader implications for democracy. The heavy-handed approach taken by authorities in stifling independent media outlets raises troubling questions about the balance between national security and the fundamental right to freedom of the press. Critics argue that such actions undermine the pillars of a democratic society, as a free and vibrant press is essential for holding those in power accountable and fostering an informed citizenry. The editorial analysis delves into the nuanced dynamics between the state’s security imperatives and the imperative to safeguard democratic principles, shedding light on the widening gap between legal measures and the pursuit of justice in the context of press freedom in India.
Tag: GS-2: Fundamental rights; Indian Constitution; Right to Information; Transparency & accountability.
Exam View
Constitutional background of press freedom in India; Status of press freedom in India today; Challenges obstructing press freedom in India; Protective measures for the press.
Context
Recent actions against journalists from the online portal NewsClick, such as raids, seizures, and arrests, amplify the calls for protections of digital data and press freedom.
Constitutional background of press freedom in India
- Freedom of press or media refers to the rights given by the Constitution of India under the freedom and expression of speech in Article 19(1)(a).
- Article 19 of Universal Declaration of Human Rights enshrined that everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression.
Status of press freedom in India
- The NewsClick incident:
- The interrogations pivot on three significant events: the anti-farm law protests, the North East Delhi riots of 2020, and the response to COVID-19.
- All these events are not just matters of public interest demanding accountability from the Union Government but also subjects of criminal prosecutions by the Delhi police.
- The very entity they report on now investigates and knows everything about them.
- By May 2023, 44 media entities and journalists had faced scrutiny from investigative and tax agencies over the previous five years.
Challenges obstructing Press Freedom in India
- Archaic laws:
- The Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), rooted in the time of telegraphs and wooden chests, guides India’s criminal justice process.
- This approach not only ignores the invasiveness of modern technological advances but also struggles to uphold democratic rights within the Constitution of India.
- Self-incrimination:
- Specific laws such as the Prevention of Money Laundering Act and the Income-Tax Act clash with the right to privacy and protection against self-incrimination, as stated in Part III and Article 20(3) of the Constitution.
- Legal Vacuum:
- The Karnataka High Court, in the Virendra Khanna vs State of Karnataka case determined that an arrested individual can indeed be coerced to unlock their smartphone, granting law enforcement unrestricted access to personal data.
- While a Central Bureau of Investigation special court has ruled to the contrary and the law is in flux, the confusion results in a guarantee of investigatory oppression.
- Police misbehaviour:
- Chapter 8 of the CrPC houses the essence of the search and seizure powers.
- The law provides for voluntary document submission and police actions based on warrants, but people often comply with law enforcement demands without warrants, fearing negative consequences.
- The Lokniti-CSDS-Common Cause ‘Status of Policing in India’ report shows that 47% believe that the police can access their phones without consent.
- Forceful disclosure of sources:
- The forceful unlocking of their devices and subsequent cloning of their content uncovers information far beyond the scope of typical criminal investigations.
- Such access lays bare years of their personal and professional communications, exposing intricate relationships, networks, and confidential sources.
- The quiet judiciary:
- Journalist Paranjoy Guha Thakurta. consulted with NewsClick and was interrogated by the Delhi police.
- Even before this incident, the Pegasus spyware compromised his phone, prompting him to seek the Supreme Court’s intervention.
- Yet, his case, among others, has not seen a hearing in over a year, even with an order specifying a listing within four weeks.
Protective measures for the press
- Shielding the press: Strengthen legal protections against censorship and reform laws that can be misused to restrict press freedom.
- Create impartial media regulators: Establish independent media regulatory bodies that are free from government control and political influence.
- Safeguarding journalists and whistleblowers from harassment, violence, and threats, both online and offline.
- Uphold journalistic integrity: Media organisations should be trained to uphold journalistic integrity along with ensuring accuracy, fairness, and balanced reporting.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
1. Why did the state seize control of India’s press?
A: The state’s seizure of India’s press is purportedly in response to perceived threats to national security. Authorities argue that certain media outlets were engaging in activities that could compromise the country’s safety, necessitating intervention to safeguard public interests.
2. How does the seizure impact freedom of the press?
A: The seizure has raised significant concerns about the erosion of press freedom. Critics argue that such actions curtail the independence of media outlets, limiting their ability to act as watchdogs and undermining the democratic principle of a free and vibrant press holding those in power accountable.
3. What legal justifications are being cited for the state’s actions?
A: The state claims to be acting within the legal framework, citing provisions related to national security and public order. However, critics question the proportionality of the measures taken, expressing concerns that they may infringe upon the constitutional right to freedom of speech and expression.
4. How are journalists and media organizations responding to the seizure?
A: Many journalists and media organizations are vocally opposing the state’s actions, asserting their commitment to journalistic integrity and the public’s right to information. Legal challenges are also being explored to contest the grounds on which the state has seized control of certain press entities.
5. What are the broader implications for Indian democracy?
A: The seizure of India’s press has sparked a broader debate about the state of democracy in the country. It raises questions about the delicate balance between national security imperatives and the preservation of democratic values. The incident underscores the need for a nuanced approach that respects both security concerns and the fundamental principles of a free and democratic society.
In case you still have your doubts, contact us on 9811333901.
For UPSC Prelims Resources, Click here
For Daily Updates and Study Material:
Join our Telegram Channel – Edukemy for IAS
- 1. Learn through Videos – here
- 2. Be Exam Ready by Practicing Daily MCQs – here
- 3. Daily Newsletter – Get all your Current Affairs Covered – here
- 4. Mains Answer Writing Practice – here
