The ICJ follows a structured process that typically involves the submission of written pleadings, oral arguments, and the issuance of a judgment. Both parties present their cases, and the Court deliberates before delivering a final decision. The process aims to ensure a fair and comprehensive examination of the legal issues at hand.
Tag: GS – 2 International Treaties & Agreements, Bilateral Groupings & Agreements, Groupings & Agreements Involving India and/or Affecting India’s Interests
In News:
A recent delves into the Genocide Convention and the ongoing ‘South Africa vs Israel Case’ at the International Court of Justice (ICJ).
Genocide Convention
- About:
- The Genocide Convention codified the crime of genocide in international law.
- Adopted by the UN General Assembly on December 9, 1948.
- Reflects the commitment to ‘never again’ after the atrocities of World War II.
- A pivotal step in the development of international human rights and criminal law.
- Features:
- Genocide is a crime applicable in both war and peace, as per the Convention.
- The Convention’s definition is widely adopted at national and international levels.
- Establishes the obligation on State Parties to prevent and punish genocide.
- Considered as norms of international customary law, binding on all states.
‘South Africa vs Israel Case’ at ICJ
- South Africa’s Allegations:
- Accusations include killing Palestinians, destruction of homes, expulsion, and displacement by Israeli forces.
- Involves a blockade on essential supplies and measures preventing Palestinian births.
- South Africa’s Demands:
- Urgent ICJ intervention through “provisional measures” to prevent further crimes.
- Argues the need for measures to protect the rights of Palestinians violated under the Genocide Convention.
- Israel’s Stand:
- Israel rejects allegations, defending its actions as self-defense under international humanitarian law.
- Views the case as “preposterous” and denies committing genocide.
- International Community’s Stand:
- Several countries and organizations support South Africa’s suit.
- The US supports Israel, claiming allegations of genocide are unfounded.
- The UK and France oppose the case.
Different Concerns in the Case:
- ICJ as One Forum:
- Questions about focusing on Israel while non-state actors like Hamas can’t be brought to the ICJ.
- The ICC deals with individuals, and the situation has been referred for investigation.
- Global Split:
- Divide among nations, reflecting historical power dynamics.
- Bangladesh and Jordan support South Africa, while Germany backs Israel.
- France’s statements contribute to challenges to the legitimacy of international law.
Laws and Regulations in India for Genocide
- International Conventions:
- India has no specific domestic law on genocide but has ratified the UN Convention on Genocide.
- Signatory to the UDHR, ICCPR, and ICESCR.
- Indian Penal Code (IPC):
- IPC Section 153B addresses genocide, criminalizing acts promoting enmity between groups with intent to cause violence.
- Constitutional Provisions:
- Article 15 prohibits discrimination based on religion, race, caste, etc.
- Article 21 guarantees the right to life and personal liberty.
- Statutory Provisions:
- The NHRC, established in 1993 under the PHRA, oversees human rights.
Ways to Prevent Genocides and War Crimes
- Prevent Armed Conflict
- Address root causes: hatred, intolerance, racism, discrimination, tyranny.
- Tackle inequalities in resource access.
- Protect Civilians
- Prioritize protection of civilians, especially when targeted based on identity.
- End Impunity through Judicial Action
- Bring perpetrators to justice to deter future crimes.
- Establish accountability to foster a culture of prevention.
- Appointing Special Advisers
- Special Advisers on the Prevention of Genocide collect information on potential risks.
- Swift Actions, including via Military Force
- UNSC intervention when peaceful methods fail.
- Collective action in a timely and decisive manner.
Conclusion
The legal proceedings initiated by South Africa against Israel at the ICJ have sparked global debate, revolving around allegations of genocide. The case not only addresses the crisis in Gaza but also serves as a test for the rules-based international order. The ICJ’s decisions will significantly impact perceptions of the international legal framework.
| UPSC Previous Year Questions Prelims (2020) Q. Other than the Fundamental Rights, which of the following parts of the Constitution of India reflect/ reflects the principles and provisions of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948)? 1. Preamble 2. Directive Principles of State Policy 3. Fundamental Duties Select the correct answer using the code given below: (a) 1 and 2 only (b) 2 only (c) 1 and 3 only (d) 1, 2 and 3 Ans: (d) Mains (2021) Q. Though the Human Rights Commissions have contributed immensely to the protection of human rights in India, yet they have failed to assert themselves against the mighty and powerful. Analysing their structural and practical limitations, suggest remedial measures. |
Source: TH
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
FAQ: What is the basis of South Africa’s case against Israel at the ICJ?
Answer: The specific details of the case would depend on the legal arguments put forth by South Africa. It could involve alleged violations of international law, human rights abuses, or disputes related to specific treaties or agreements.
FAQ: Has there been any historical precedent for ICJ cases involving South Africa and Israel?
Answer: There were no known ICJ cases specifically between South Africa and Israel. However, historical precedents in other cases may be considered if they establish legal principles relevant to the current dispute.
FAQ: What are the potential implications of the ICJ’s decision on South Africa-Israel relations?
Answer: The ICJ’s decision could have diplomatic, political, and legal ramifications. Depending on the ruling, it might impact the relations between South Africa and Israel, potentially influencing regional dynamics and international perceptions.
FAQ: How does the ICJ process work, and what stages are involved in proceedings?
Answer: The ICJ follows a structured process that typically involves the submission of written pleadings, oral arguments, and the issuance of a judgment. Both parties present their cases, and the Court deliberates before delivering a final decision. The process aims to ensure a fair and comprehensive examination of the legal issues at hand.
FAQ: Can the ICJ’s decision be appealed, and how is enforcement ensured?
Answer: The ICJ’s decisions are final and binding, and there is no formal mechanism for appeal. However, enforcement relies on the willingness of the parties involved to comply. The United Nations Security Council may also play a role in ensuring compliance, as it has the authority to take measures to enforce ICJ decisions.
In case you still have your doubts, contact us on 9811333901.
For UPSC Prelims Resources, Click here
For Daily Updates and Study Material:
Join our Telegram Channel – Edukemy for IAS
- 1. Learn through Videos – here
- 2. Be Exam Ready by Practicing Daily MCQs – here
- 3. Daily Newsletter – Get all your Current Affairs Covered – here
- 4. Mains Answer Writing Practice – here
