An analysis of the unfulfilled promises within the Indian Parliament reveals a disconcerting gap between political rhetoric and tangible outcomes. Despite being the cornerstone of democratic governance, the legislative body often grapples with challenges that impede the realization of promises made to the electorate. The issue transcends party lines, as successive governments have struggled to translate their commitments into effective policies. Factors such as bureaucratic hurdles, partisan gridlock, and a complex socio-economic landscape contribute to this disparity. While political discourse is replete with assurances of development, social justice, and economic progress, the actual implementation of these promises remains elusive. This underscores the need for a more introspective approach, wherein the mechanisms of parliamentary functioning are critically examined and reformed to bridge the divide between promise and delivery, fostering a more accountable and responsive system of governance.
Tag: GS-2 Polity
In News:
Recently, a significant security breach in the Indian Parliament, coupled with the demand for a discussion on the matter, resulted in the suspension of 150 opposition MPs.
Historical Evolution of India’s Parliamentary System**
- Post-independence, India confronted the formidable task of constitution-making to define its governance model.
- The Constituent Assembly debates reflected diverse opinions, leading to the adoption of the parliamentary form of government.
- Primary stances during deliberations: Presidential system, Indian orthodoxy, Swarajist model, and the parliamentary system.
Deliberations within the Constituent Assembly
- Debate on the Presidential Model
- Advocates emphasized stability, national unity, and centralization inspired by the American model.
- Inclination towards religious and social majoritarianism was notable.
- Debate on Indian Orthodoxy
- Aimed at establishing a regime rooted in traditional Indian institutional wisdom.
- Rooted in the anti-colonial movement’s core beliefs.
- Debate on the Swarajist Model
- Influenced by Gandhi’s philosophy, envisioned a decentralized system.
- Emphasized significant powers for village panchayats and autonomy at higher levels.
- Debate on Parliamentary System
- Argued for decisive authority representing the citizen community.
- Highlighted inclusive space, minority representation, and accommodation of pluralism.
Pangs of Creating an Opposition: The Dual Nature of the Parliamentary System
- Represents the Paradox of Parliamentary Governance
- Balancing electoral mandate and critical validation from opposition for the common good.
- Ideal for addressing inherent challenges within the parliamentary model.
- Necessary for Balancing Stability and Accountability
- Early days lacked explicit references to political parties in the constitution.
- The ruling party’s stability depends on addressing concerns raised by a vigilant opposition.
- Nehru’s Sensitivity and the Evolution of Opposition
- Nehru’s recognition of the need for an effective opposition in the First Lok Sabha.
- Highlighted tension between stability and accountability.
Security Breach and Present State of India’s Parliamentary Affairs
- Opposition’s Reasonable Demand for Accountability
- Security breach threatens India’s democratic core, requiring a comprehensive evaluation.
- Opposition’s demand reflects concern for parliamentary system security and stability.
- Less Satisfactory Response by Leadership
- Instead of collaboration, a tendency to treat demands as an affront to Parliament’s functioning.
- Risks hindering collaborative efforts for legislative institution security and resilience.
Way Forward
- Viewing Opposition’s demands as an opportunity to collaborate for the nation’s interest.
- Balancing defending parliamentary dignity with collective efforts for security and resilience.
Conclusion
- Recent events underscore immediate security concerns and broader challenges.
- Emphasizes the need for a robust opposition, responsible leadership, and adherence to parliamentary principles.
- Crucial for maintaining the integrity and continued relevance of India’s foundational institution in its dynamic democracy.
Source: TH
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Q: Why does the Indian Parliament face challenges in fulfilling promises?
A: The Indian Parliament encounters challenges in fulfilling promises due to factors such as bureaucratic hurdles, partisan gridlock, and the complexities of the socio-economic landscape, which often impede the smooth translation of commitments into effective policies.
Q: Are unfulfilled promises in the Indian Parliament limited to a specific political party?
A: No, the issue of unfulfilled promises transcends party lines. Successive governments, regardless of their political affiliations, have grappled with difficulties in transforming their assurances into tangible outcomes, indicating systemic challenges within the parliamentary framework.
Q: How do bureaucratic hurdles contribute to unfulfilled promises in the Indian Parliament?
A: Bureaucratic hurdles pose a significant obstacle to the fulfillment of promises in the Indian Parliament. Cumbersome administrative processes, red tape, and delays in decision-making hinder the effective implementation of policies, leading to a gap between political rhetoric and actual outcomes.
Q: What role does partisan gridlock play in the unfulfilled promises of the Indian Parliament?
A: Partisan gridlock, marked by political disagreements and a lack of consensus among different parties, often stalls legislative processes. This gridlock can prevent the timely passage of bills and hinder the execution of promised reforms, contributing to the unfulfilled commitments within the Indian Parliament.
Q: How can the Indian Parliament address the challenge of unfulfilled promises and enhance accountability?
A: Addressing the challenge of unfulfilled promises in the Indian Parliament requires a more introspective approach. Reforms in parliamentary functioning, increased transparency, and fostering a culture of accountability are crucial. Additionally, strengthening mechanisms for monitoring and evaluating policy implementation can contribute to closing the gap between promises and actual delivery.
In case you still have your doubts, contact us on 9811333901.
For UPSC Prelims Resources, Click here
For Daily Updates and Study Material:
Join our Telegram Channel – Edukemy for IAS
- 1. Learn through Videos – here
- 2. Be Exam Ready by Practicing Daily MCQs – here
- 3. Daily Newsletter – Get all your Current Affairs Covered – here
- 4. Mains Answer Writing Practice – here
