UPSC Mains – Is the current criminal justice system in our country still reflective of its colonial past? Examine the necessity for reforming the criminal justice system in India.

Introduction:

India’s institutions, including the criminal justice system, often grapple with the shadows of colonial rule. The establishment of a committee by the ministry to address issues within the criminal justice system has raised concerns among stakeholders. These concerns mainly revolve around the limited scope for public consultation by the committee and the notably brief timeframe allotted for its operations.

Body:

The urgency for reforms in the criminal justice system is imperative for various reasons:

Colonial Origins of Laws:

1. Indian Penal Code (IPC) of 1860: Enacted during British colonial rule by Lord Macaulay, the IPC reflects outdated Victorian moral and legal values, misaligned with contemporary societal norms.
2. Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) of 1973: Although introduced post-independence, the CrPC retains colonial-era procedures, resulting in prolonged and complex legal proceedings.
3. Indian Evidence Act of 1872: Passed during the British colonial period, this act reflects a colonial understanding of evidence that may not be suitable for modern legal processes.
4. Outdated Provisions: The CrPC still harbors cumbersome procedures, causing delays and a backlog of cases. Provisions in the Indian Evidence Act relating to electronic evidence and modern forensic techniques require updating.
5. Protection of Individual Rights: Amendments in procedural laws can expedite trials, safeguard the rights of the accused, and enhance the overall criminal justice system.
6. Efficiency and Transparency: Digitalization and modernization are necessary to manage cases, evidence, and court proceedings effectively.
7. Changing Societal Norms: Reforms are essential to address contemporary issues such as cybercrimes, gender-based violence, and environmental offenses in line with evolving societal norms.
8. Access to Justice: Reforms can broaden access to justice for marginalized communities, addressing problems like overcrowded prisons, inadequate legal aid, and the need for alternatives to incarceration.

Persistent Issues in the System:

1. Backlog of Cases: India’s courts grapple with a massive backlog, with the Supreme Court having 66,600 pending cases and High Courts facing over 45 lakh cases in 2020.
2. Procedural Delays: Lower courts take over 3 years on average to conclude cases, while the Supreme Court has an average pendency of around 5 years.
3. Overburdened Judiciary: High vacancies in the lower judiciary affect the system’s efficiency, as reported by the National Judicial Data Grid.
4. Inefficient Investigation: Inefficiencies in investigations lead to delays in filing charge sheets and low conviction rates, as reported by the National Crime Records Bureau in 2019.
5. High Rates of Undertrials: Over 70% of India’s prison population comprises undertrials, contributing to prison overcrowding. Police Reform: Issues of accountability and modernization hinder the effectiveness of India’s police force.
6. Outdated Laws: Laws related to obscenity, sedition, and defamation remain in the legal framework, often infringing upon freedom of expression.
7. Access to Justice: A report by the Justice Project indicates that 60% of India’s prison population comes from Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, or Other Backward Classes.
8. Prison Conditions: Overcrowding persists in India’s prisons, with a 119.4% occupancy rate in 2022.

Significant Steps Taken:

1. National Mission for Justice Delivery and Legal Reforms: Focuses on enhancing infrastructure, filling judicial vacancies, and utilizing technology in courts.
2. Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987: Establishes legal services authorities for free legal aid and equal access to justice, particularly for marginalized communities.
3. E-Courts Project: Aims to digitize court proceedings, case management, and records for increased efficiency and reduced paperwork.
4. Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR): Promotes mechanisms like mediation and arbitration to reduce the burden on the formal judicial system.
5. Police Reforms: Some states have initiated police reforms, addressing training, transparency, and accountability.
6. Amendments to Criminal Laws: The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013, introduced stringent provisions, particularly in response to the Nirbhaya case.
7. Bail Reforms: The Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2005, emphasizes the right to bail and limits preventive detention.
8. Victim-Centric Initiatives: Reforms include witness protection programs and victim compensation schemes.
9. Prevention, Prohibition, and Redressal Act, 2013: Establishes specialized courts for gender-based violence cases.

Conclusion:

The Indian criminal justice system, rooted in the colonial era, grapples with deep-rooted issues that necessitate comprehensive reform. Reforming such a complex system requires more than well-intentioned efforts by government-appointed committees; it demands the active participation and voice of the entire nation.

In case you still have your doubts, contact us on 9811333901. 

For UPSC Prelims Resources, Click here

For Daily Updates and Study Material:

Join our Telegram Channel – Edukemy for IAS

• 1. Learn through Videos – here
• 2. Be Exam Ready by Practicing Daily MCQs – here
• 3. Daily Newsletter – Get all your Current Affairs Covered – here
• 4. Mains Answer Writing Practice – here

Visit our YouTube Channel – here