A nuanced exploration of Western and Indian forms of secularism unveils a tapestry of ideological distinctions and cultural intricacies. Rooted in historical, philosophical, and sociopolitical contexts, these two paradigms diverge in their approach toward the relationship between religion and state. Western secularism, predominantly exemplified by the separation of church and state, champions a principle of neutrality, aiming to create a public sphere devoid of religious influence. Contrastingly, Indian secularism, born out of a pluralistic society with a rich tapestry of religious diversity, embodies a principle of “principled distance,” fostering an inclusive environment where the state respects and accommodates various faith traditions. Understanding the similarities, differences, and the underlying ethos of Western and Indian secularism is essential for grasping the complexities of governance, identity, and religious freedom in today’s globalized world.
- There exists a fundamental difference between the Western concept of secularism and the Indian concept, in that the complete separation of religion and state is not applicable in the Indian interpretation of the term.
- In our polity, the state seeks to protect all religions equally. For example, the secular Indian state declares public holidays to mark the festivals of all Religions.
- In context of India, it is sometimes argued that the concept of secularism has been imported from the west. But it is clear from the above differences that in the west, strict church and state separation is the main area of focus; while in India peaceful co-existence of all religions is the focus.
- The ‘Sarva Dharma Samabhava’ concept is deeply entrenched in the Indian mindset which embody the equality of the destination of the paths followed by all the religions.(i.e. equal treatment of all religions)
| Indian Secularism | Western Secularism |
| Equal protection by the state to all religions.It reflects certain meanings. First secular state to be one that protects all religions,but does not favor one at the cost of other and does not adopt any religion as state religion. | Separation of state and religion as mutual exclusion it means both are mutually exclusive in their own spheres of operations. |
| The idea of inter-religious equality is at the core of Indian secularism. Equal focus has been given on the inter-religious and the intra-religious equality. It not only deals with the religious freedom of the individuals but with the minority communities also. | Interpreted liberty as liberty of individual and freedom as freedom of the individual and equality between individuals. There is little scope for community based rights or minority based rights. |
| It promotes state sponsored reforms in the religious sphere on equal footing. | There is a mechanism for the intra-religion equality in the western notion of secularism, not of inter-religion equality thus state maintains an arm’s length distance from religion in all matters. |
| Indian secularism allows for principled state intervention in all religions. Such intervention betrays disrespect to some aspects of every religion. The secular state does not have to treat each aspect of every religion with equal respect. It allows equal disrespect for some aspects of organized religions. Example practicing social evils as essential part of religion. | The west adopted this model due to the two reasons that it was more or less a homogenous society in comparison to India, so they naturally focused on the intra-religious domination and strict separation of the state from the church was emphasized to realize the individual freedom. |
Constitutional provisions regarding secularism
In India, freedom of religion is a Fundamental Right and is guaranteed through the following Provisions:
- Article 25: guarantees freedom of conscience and free profession, practice and propagation of religion.
- Article 26: every religious denomination has the freedom to manage its religious affairs.
- Article 27: Freedom from payment of taxes for promotion of any particular religion.
- Article 28: Freedom as to attendance at religious instruction or religious worship in certain educational institutions.
Other Constitutional safeguards regarding religion include the following:
- Article 15: Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth.
- Article 16: Equality of opportunity in matters of public employment and no citizens shall be ineligible for employment on grounds only of religion, race, caste, sex, descent, place of birth.
- Article 29: Protection of distinct language, script or culture of minorities
- Article 30: Rights of all minorities, whether based on religion or language, to establish and administer educational institutions of their choice.
The Preamble of India states that India is a secular country (added after 42nd Amendment Act, 1976).
FAQs
Q: What is the fundamental difference between Western and Indian secularism?
Western secularism typically involves the separation of church and state, where religious institutions are distinct from government entities. In contrast, Indian secularism promotes a principle of equal treatment of all religions by the state, aiming to maintain religious harmony and prevent discrimination based on religion.
Q: How do Western and Indian secularism address religious diversity?
Western secularism often emphasizes individual freedom of religion, allowing individuals to practice any religion or none at all without interference from the state. Indian secularism, on the other hand, acknowledges and accommodates the religious diversity within the country by endorsing a policy of state neutrality and non-interference in religious affairs.
Q: Are there any challenges specific to Indian secularism?
Yes, one significant challenge in India is the concept of ‘majority rule’ where the Hindu majority sometimes influences government policies, potentially marginalizing minority religions. This poses a challenge to the ideal of equal treatment of all religions.
Q: How does the approach to secularism impact governance in the West and India?
In Western countries, secularism often leads to a clear separation of religion from government institutions, ensuring decisions are made without religious bias. In India, the approach to secularism involves state involvement in religious matters to ensure fairness and maintain social harmony, which can sometimes lead to debates over the extent of government interference in religious affairs.
Q: Which model of secularism is more effective in fostering religious harmony?
Both Western and Indian models have their strengths and weaknesses in promoting religious harmony. While Western secularism provides a clear separation of religion and state, Indian secularism actively engages with religious diversity to ensure inclusivity. Effectiveness depends on the context and the level of commitment to secular principles within each society.
In case you still have your doubts, contact us on 9811333901.
For UPSC Prelims Resources, Click here
For Daily Updates and Study Material:
Join our Telegram Channel – Edukemy for IAS
- 1. Learn through Videos – here
- 2. Be Exam Ready by Practicing Daily MCQs – here
- 3. Daily Newsletter – Get all your Current Affairs Covered – here
- 4. Mains Answer Writing Practice – here
