Lord Lytton’s “Policy of Proud Reserve” aimed to establish scientific frontiers, clarify relations with Afghanistan and safeguard British spheres of influence. This policy resulted in the Second Anglo-Afghan War (1878-1880):
- Second Anglo-Afghan War (1878-1880): As part of the policy, Lord Lytton initiated the invasion of Afghanistan. The war aimed to assert British influence in the region and clarify the terms of engagement with Afghanistan.
- Treaty of Gandamak (May 1879): The war culminated in the signing of the Treaty of Gandamak in May 1879. The key provisions of the treaty included:
- The Amir (ruler of Afghanistan) would conduct his foreign policy with the advice of the Government of India.
- A permanent British resident would be stationed at Kabul, ensuring a British presence in the Afghan capital.
- The shift in Policy by Ripon: Lord Ripon, who succeeded Lytton as Viceroy, abandoned the aggressive approach and adopted a policy of keeping Afghanistan as a buffer state. This marked a departure from Lytton’s confrontational strategy.
In summary, Lord Lytton’s “Policy of Proud Reserve” resulted in the Second Anglo-Afghan War and the subsequent Treaty of Gandamak, which aimed to secure British influence in Afghanistan. However, Lord Ripon later shifted the policy towards maintaining Afghanistan as a buffer state to ensure regional stability.
Key Aspects of Lytton and the Policy of Proud Reserve
Lord Lytton’s tenure as the Viceroy of India (1876-1880) was marked by the introduction of a foreign policy known as the “policy of proud reserve.” This policy aimed to redefine and assert British influence in the region, particularly concerning Afghanistan. Here are key points related to Lytton’s policy:
- The objective of the Policy: Lord Lytton aimed to establish clear and scientifically defined frontiers for British India and protect British spheres of influence. The policy of proud reserve sought to assert dominance over territories and neighboring regions.
- Departure from Masterly Inactivity: Lytton’s policy represented a departure from the previous approach of masterly inactivity, which emphasized a cautious and non-interventionist stance in foreign affairs. The policy of proud reserve was more assertive and proactive.
- Clarification of Relationship with Afghanistan: Lytton believed that the relationship with Afghanistan needed to be clarified and made explicit. The policy aimed to redefine the terms of engagement with Afghanistan to secure British interests in the region.
- Assertion of Dominance and Control: The policy emphasized asserting British dominance and control over territories. This proactive stance was intended to maintain stability in the region and prevent challenges to British influence.
- Scientific Frontiers: Lytton advocated for the establishment of clear and scientifically defined frontiers for British India. This was seen as a strategic move to secure a strong and secure position for British India.
- Mixed Results and Criticism: Lytton’s policy faced criticism and had mixed results. It led to strained relations with Afghanistan and resulted in the Second Anglo-Afghan War (1878-1880). Additionally, the policy encountered challenges during the Great Famine of 1876-1878, where the British response was criticized for inadequacy.
- Shift towards Proactive Foreign Policy: Overall, Lytton’s policy of proud reserve marked a shift towards a more proactive and assertive foreign policy approach. The aim was to safeguard British interests, redefine relationships with neighboring states, and establish a stable and secure position for British India in the region.
In summary, Lord Lytton’s policy of proud reserve reflected a departure from the cautious approach of masterly inactivity, advocating for a more assertive and proactive stance in British India’s foreign affairs.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
1. Who was Lord Lytton, and what was his role in British colonial administration?
Lord Lytton, also known as Viceroy of India, served from 1876 to 1880. He was responsible for overseeing British interests in India during a crucial period of colonial rule.
2. What is the “Policy of Proud Reserve,” and how did it impact India?
The “Policy of Proud Reserve” refers to Lord Lytton’s approach of maintaining a reserved and haughty stance towards the Indian princely states. It aimed to assert British dominance and control over the Indian princely states, often leading to strained relations.
3. How did the Indian princely states react to Lord Lytton’s “Policy of Proud Reserve”?
Many Indian princely states opposed Lord Lytton’s policy as it undermined their autonomy and dignity. This approach resulted in increased dissatisfaction among the native rulers and contributed to growing resentment against British rule.
4. What were the consequences of the “Policy of Proud Reserve” on British-Indian relations?
The policy exacerbated tensions between the British and Indian princely states, contributing to a sense of mistrust and discontent. It eventually played a role in shaping the political climate that led to the Indian Independence movement.
5. How did the “Policy of Proud Reserve” contribute to the overall narrative of British colonialism in India?
Lord Lytton’s policy underscored the imperialistic and authoritative nature of British colonial rule in India. It further fueled nationalist sentiments and played a part in the eventual struggle for independence as Indians sought to break free from such oppressive policies.
In case you still have your doubts, contact us on 9811333901.
For UPSC Prelims Resources, Click here
For Daily Updates and Study Material:
Join our Telegram Channel – Edukemy for IAS
- 1. Learn through Videos – here
- 2. Be Exam Ready by Practicing Daily MCQs – here
- 3. Daily Newsletter – Get all your Current Affairs Covered – here
- 4. Mains Answer Writing Practice – here
