The assertion that “human beings should always be treated as ‘ends’ in themselves and never as ‘means'” encapsulates a fundamental ethical principle rooted in Kantian philosophy. It underscores the intrinsic value and dignity of every individual, emphasizing that they should never be merely instrumentalized for the benefit of others. Treating someone as an end in themselves means respecting their autonomy, agency, and inherent worth, recognizing their capacity for rationality and moral decision-making. In contrast, treating individuals as mere means reduces them to tools or objects for achieving external goals, disregarding their humanity and subjecting them to exploitation or manipulation.
In the modern techno-economic society, this principle holds profound implications. Rapid advancements in technology and the relentless pursuit of economic growth have often led to the commodification of human beings, where they are treated as expendable resources or data points in algorithms. This mindset can manifest in various forms, such as exploitative labor practices, invasive surveillance, or the manipulation of consumer behavior for profit. Upholding the principle of treating individuals as ends in themselves requires safeguarding their rights, ensuring fair and equitable treatment, and fostering a culture of respect and dignity amidst the pressures of a technologically driven economy.
Tag: Attitude: content, structure, function; its influence and relation with thought and behaviour; moral and political attitudes; social influence and persuasion.
Decoding the Question:
- In Introduction, try to start your answer with the explanation of the given statement.
- In Body, discuss Significance of this statement in the modern techno-economic society.
- In Conclusion, try to end your answer by giving some suggestions and examples.
Answer:
The philosopher Immanuel Kant said that rational human beings should be treated as an end in themselves and not as a means to something else. The fact that we are human has value in itself. If a person is an end-in-themself it means their inherent value doesn’t depend on anything else – it doesn’t depend on whether the person is enjoying their life, or making other people’s lives better. We exist, so we have value.
Significance of this statement in the modern techno-economic society
- This principle has often been violated in Modern society globally. Examples are holocaust, killing of Kulaks during Russian collectivization and atrocities during Cultural Revolution in China.
- New technologies like cloning and stem cell research may tempt scientists and politicians to conduct experiments which violate the sanctity of human life and dignity. Similar dangers lurk in robotics and artificial intelligence; these advances need regulation in human interest
- People shouldn’t treat other people as a means to their own ends..
- The idea also shows up in discussions of animal rights, with the idea that if they have rights, animals must be treated as ends in themselves.
This idea applies to us too. We shouldn’t treat ourselves as a means to our own ends; instead, we should respect our inherent worth. This can be used as an argument against euthanasia, suicide and other behaviours that damage ourselves.
In case you still have your doubts, contact us on 9811333901.
For UPSC Prelims Resources, Click here
For Daily Updates and Study Material:
Join our Telegram Channel – Edukemy for IAS
- 1. Learn through Videos – here
- 2. Be Exam Ready by Practicing Daily MCQs – here
- 3. Daily Newsletter – Get all your Current Affairs Covered – here
- 4. Mains Answer Writing Practice – here
