Introduction
The Indian National Movement, a long and multifaceted struggle for independence from British colonial rule, witnessed the Moderate Phase(1885-1905) and the Extremist Phase(1905-1920) characterized by differing ideologies and approaches. The leaders of these phases held differing views on the methods and goals of the movement that had profound implications for the trajectory of the movement.
Body
The key ideological differences between the Moderate and Extremist leaders:
| Aspect | Moderates | Extremists |
| Approach | Constitutional and peaceful means | Direct action and mass mobilization |
| Reforms vs. Revolution | Advocated gradual reforms | Called for immediate self-rule (Swaraj) |
| Loyalty to the British | Emphasized loyalty to the British Crown | Advocated a more assertive stance |
| Mass Participation | Focused on a limited educated elite | Mobilized the masses actively |
| Nature of Protests | Petitions, resolutions, negotiations | Direct action, protests, and strikes |
| Pace of Progress | Slow-paced progress | Energetic and fast-paced progress |
| Influence on Policies | Limited influence on British policies | Forced British government concessions |
| Ideological leader | Dadabhai Naoroji, Gopal Krishna Gokhale | Bal Gangadhar Tilak, Bipin Chandra Pal, Lala Lajpat Rai |
Impact on the Trajectory of the Movement:
Nature of Protests:
- Moderates: The Moderates’ adoption of a peaceful and constitutional approach led to gradual progress, with petitions and negotiations often yielding limited immediate results. Gopal Krishna Gokhale, for instance, advocated for reforms like the Indian Councils Act of 1909, representing a step forward but falling short of complete self-governance.
- Extremists: In contrast, the Extremists embraced more assertive methods. Bal Gangadhar Tilak’s advocacy for Swadeshi (boycott of foreign goods) and the use of mass mobilization tactics, such as protests and strikes, gained rapid momentum and garnered widespread support. The Extremist-led Swadeshi movement demonstrated the potential for swift and dynamic action.
Mass Mobilization:
- Moderates: The Moderates primarily targeted the educated middle class and urban elites, resulting in limited outreach to the masses. Dadabhai Naoroji’s efforts in the Indian National Congress mainly appealed to the educated few, and his demands were often cautious.
- Extremists: The Extremists actively worked to involve the masses in the nationalist movement. Bal Gangadhar Tilak, employing mass-based politics through his newspaper Kesari, effectively communicated with the common people. Mass participation in movements like the Non-Cooperation Movement and Civil Disobedience Movement showcased the Extremists’ success in mobilizing the masses.
Shift in British Policies:
- Moderates: The Moderates’ approach exerted limited influence on British policies. While they sought reforms such as greater representation in legislative bodies, their gains were incremental. The Morley-Minto Reforms of 1909, influenced by Moderate demands, introduced limited electoral reforms but retained substantial British control.
- Extremists: The Extremist phase compelled the British government to pay closer attention to Indian political demands. The Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms of 1919, influenced by the rising tide of Extremism, introduced significant changes, including a larger Indian role in governance. The Extremists’ aggressive stance accelerated the pace of constitutional reforms.
Radicalization:
- Moderates: Due to their cautious approach, the Moderates focused on limited, incremental reforms within the British colonial structure, leading to a conservative outlook.
- Extremists: The Extremists’ radical demands, such as complete independence (Swaraj), contributed to the radicalization of Indian politics. The militant stance of leaders like Bhagat Singh in the 1920s and the rise of revolutionary movements were influenced by the Extremist phase.
Conclusion:
Hence, the ideological differences between the Moderate and Extremist leaders during the Indian National Movement were instrumental in shaping the course of the struggle for independence. The Extremist phase, with its radicalism and mass participation, played a pivotal role in galvanizing the movement and ultimately paved the way for India’s eventual independence in 1947.
In case you still have your doubts, contact us on 9811333901.
For UPSC Prelims Resources, Click here
For Daily Updates and Study Material:
Join our Telegram Channel – Edukemy for IAS
- 1. Learn through Videos – here
- 2. Be Exam Ready by Practicing Daily MCQs – here
- 3. Daily Newsletter – Get all your Current Affairs Covered – here
- 4. Mains Answer Writing Practice – here
