Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms and Government of India Act, 1919

• The Public Service Commission was established in India through the Government of India Act 1919. This act, also known as the Councils Act 1919, aimed to enhance Indian involvement in the government. One of its key provisions was the implementation of a Dual System of Government, which categorized government-controlled activities into two separate lists.

The Government of India Act (1919) - Historical Background

• The Government of India Act (1919) has its historical roots in the recommendations put forth by Edwin Montagu, who served as the Secretary of State for India in 1917. Montagu presented a report to the Cabinet, expressing his objective of fostering the progressive development of independent institutions in India, ultimately leading to self-governance.
• However, Lord Chelmsford, who was the Viceroy of India at that time, advised Montagu to focus on empowering Indian participation in all areas of governance and gradually establishing self-governing institutions instead of immediate independent institutions.
• The Cabinet agreed with Lord Chelmsford's ideas, leading to the approval of Montagu's plans. As a result, the Government of India Act (1919) became known as the Montague-Chelmsford Reforms, reflecting the collaboration between Montagu and Chelmsford in shaping the act.

The primary objective of the Government of India Act (1919) was to ensure adequate representation of Indians in the government. This act introduced reforms at both the federal and provincial levels. Here are the key provisions of the act:

• Diarchy: The Act introduced a dual government system known as diarchy at the provincial level. This meant that one set of government officials was accountable, while the other set was not. The control over provinces was relaxed by categorizing subjects as "central subjects" and "provincial subjects."
• Division of Subjects: The subjects of the provincial government were divided into two categories: reserved subjects and transferred subjects. Reserved subjects were under the authority of the British Governor of the province, while transferred subjects were assigned to Indian Ministers. The reserved subjects included justice administration, press, revenue, forests, labour dispute settlements, water, agricultural loans, police, and prisons, while subjects like local self-government, public works, sanitation, industrial research, and the establishment of new companies were included in the transferred list.
• Legislative Changes: The act granted extensive powers to the Viceroy, allowing him to enact bills without the assent of the legislature. Bicameralism was introduced in the Central Legislature, consisting of the Legislative Assembly (lower house) with 145 members serving three-year terms and the Council of States (upper house) with 60 members serving five-year terms.
• Electoral Provision: The act extended communal representation to include Sikhs, Europeans, and Anglo-Indians. Limited franchise rights were granted to a specific number of people. Non-Brahmins in Madras were provided reservations, and seats were nominated for the depressed classes in the legislatures.
• Other Provisions: The act established a Public Service Commission in India. It also increased Indian representation in the Executive Council to three out of eight members. Additionally, it established the office of the High Commissioner for India in London.
• These provisions aimed to promote Indian participation in governance and create a framework for administrative reforms in British India.

The Government of India Act (1919) held significant importance for various reasons:

• Expansion of Election Area and Voting Awareness: The act expanded the election area in India, allowing more people to participate in the electoral process. This led to increased awareness about the significance of voting among the population. Additionally, some women were granted limited voting rights for the first time, albeit based on certain income criteria. This expanded electoral participation contributed to the growth of democratic practices in India.
• Gradual Introduction of Responsible Government: The act signalled the government's intention to gradually introduce responsible government in India. It laid the foundation for the concept of self-government in provinces, granting power to the people for administration. This shift reduced administrative pressure from the government and allowed for greater local autonomy.
• Legitimization of Nationalist Demands: The act's provisions aligning with the concept of self-government became a government policy. As a result, the demands of nationalists and home rule leagues, which advocated for self-rule and autonomy, were no longer seen as seditious activities. The act helped legitimize these demands and provided a platform for nationalists to pursue their aspirations for Swaraj (self-rule).
• Awareness of Administration: The act played a crucial role in raising awareness among Indians about the processes of administration. This awareness sparked a sense of engagement and determination among the Indian population to work towards the goal of Swaraj. It facilitated a deeper understanding of the functioning of the government and encouraged active participation in political affairs.
• Overall, the Government of India Act (1919) had a profound impact on India's political landscape. It expanded electoral participation, introduced the concept of self-government, and played a significant role in shaping nationalist aspirations for Swaraj.

The Government of India Act (1919) had several notable defects:

• Communal Representation: One of the major flaws of the act was its provision for communal representation. By categorizing seats based on specific castes and religions, it further fueled the growth of communalism. This approach undermined the idea of a unified and inclusive political system, promoting divisions based on religious and caste identities.
• Limited Control over Finances and Bureaucracy: The provincial ministers appointed under the act lacked control over financial matters and the bureaucracy. They had limited authority to manage finances, making their administrative capabilities ineffective. Additionally, the bureaucrats continued to hold significant power, which hindered the autonomy and decision-making of the elected ministers.
• Lack of Consultation and Overruling Power: The act did not ensure meaningful consultation with the ministers on important matters. Often, decisions were made without their input, undermining the principles of responsible government. The governor, appointed by the British government, had the authority to overrule the ministers on any issue deemed special or significant, thus diminishing their decision-making power.
• Limited Powers of Elected Indian Ministers: The act granted elected Indian ministers nominal powers without empowering them with real authority. Their decision-making capabilities and influence were curtailed, as the ultimate power rested with the governor or the British authorities. This limited their ability to effectively represent the interests and aspirations of the Indian population.
• These defects undermined the principles of representative governance, weakened the role of elected ministers, and perpetuated a hierarchical system where British authorities retained ultimate control and decision-making authority.

Conclusion

• Despite its limitations and defects, the Government of India Act (1919) did have some positive outcomes. It laid the foundation for future developments and reforms in the governance of India. One significant provision was the establishment of a statutory commission to investigate and evaluate the functioning of the government after a period of ten years. This led to the formation of the Simon Commission in 1927, which played a crucial role in assessing the state of governance in India and recommending further reforms.
• Additionally, the act created the office of the High Commissioner for India in London. This office served as a platform for diplomatic representation and communication between India and the British government. It facilitated a direct channel for Indian concerns and interests to be conveyed to the British authorities.
• While the act had its limitations, these provisions represented steps towards engaging with the governance of India and initiating future reforms. They contributed to the evolving political landscape and provided opportunities for further discussions and improvements in the years to come.